HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › greytHR · September 2026 Edition

3 categories · Named, not ranked

greytHR

12Judge labels

0First choices

4Negative labels

6 of 12Models named it

3Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. greytHR was named 5 times in Performance management and 2 other categories, where Lattice led with 41%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business38 of 65

under the label threshold

Mid-market28 of 60

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In performance management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named greytHR for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Performance management	Performance and talent management	0%	28 of 60	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 41%
Leave and absence management	Core HR and payroll	0%	55 of 89	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by BambooHR at 28%
Time and attendance	Core HR and payroll	0%	75 of 90	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by UKG Ready at 15%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for greytHR yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated greytHR across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained4 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative12 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“greytHR is geared toward India and Middle East compliance needs.” GPT-5.4 mini · Leave · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Support that can't keep up when payroll is on the line, unreliable clock-ins, mobile gaps.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Time and attendance · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as greytHR, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and greytHR was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Keka5 of 120Not in the top three

Profit.co4 of 120Not in the top three

TimeClock Plus4 of 120Not in the top three

Effy AI3 of 122Not in the top three

Workday3 of 122Not in the top three

AssessTEAM3 of 121Not in the top three

BambooHR3 of 120Not in the top three

Eddy3 of 120Not in the top three

Rippling3 of 120Not in the top three

Small Improvements3 of 120Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named greytHR. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 12 answers that named greytHR and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

forbes.com6

g2.com6

capterra.com5

peoplemanagingpeople.com5

bigideasdb.com4

effy.ai4

softwareadvice.com4

toolradar.com4

firsthr.app3

gartner.com3

Forty-four of the forty-four domain citations in answers naming greytHR came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

bigideasdb.com/software/time-attendance4

effy.ai/blog/performance-management-software-for-small-business4

forbes.com/advisor/business/software/best-performance-management-software4

toolradar.com/best/free/performance-management4

gartner.com/reviews/market/time-and-attendance-software3

selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/time-and-attendance-software3

uschamber.com/co/run/human-resources/time-and-attendance-software3

workhuman.com/blog/best-performance-management-software3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as greytHR

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as greytHR; a claim can dispute any of them.

GreytHR 2GreytHR Free Tier 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when greytHR's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as greytHR, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at greythr.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.