Every category where a model named Elucidat for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Course authoring tools	Learning and development	2%	12 of 86	15%	20	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Elucidat yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Elucidat across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	1	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	4	0	1	5
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	3	0	1	4
Mistral Small	0	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	2	1	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	1	1	1	0	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct14 labels1

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative17 labelsNone

Budget-constrained8 labels1

Scale-constrained12 labels1

Negative13 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative67 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Rise 360 and Elucidat excel here” Kimi K2 · Course authoring tools · scale prompt · first choice

“Choose Easygenerator or Elucidat if you have multiple people ... collaborating on web-responsive courses” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Course authoring tools · comparative prompt · alternative

“Elucidat is an excellent choice. It is a cloud-based tool that excels at teamwork and version control.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Course authoring tools · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“A highly collaborative, cloud-based platform that allows you to control brand guidelines centrally” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Course authoring tools · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“What to avoid on a tight budget ... scale past a small budget quickly” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Course authoring tools · budget prompt · hard negative

“Over-templatized, high pricing, and restricted customization” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Course authoring tools · negative prompt · soft negative

“Elucidat (enterprise-scale, pricier at $1,650+)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Course authoring tools · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Elucidat, over the 67 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Elucidat was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Articulate 36053 of 6736Not in the top three

Adobe Captivate49 of 670Not in the top three

iSpring Suite46 of 675Not in the top three

Easygenerator36 of 674Not in the top three

dominKnow | ONE34 of 672Not in the top three

Lectora25 of 670Not in the top three

Articulate Rise 36017 of 676Not in the top three

H5P17 of 671Not in the top three

Articulate Storyline13 of 670Not in the top three

Gomo Learning11 of 670Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Elucidat. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 52 of the 67 answers that named Elucidat and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

elearningindustry.com36

colossyan.com32

confirm.com28

elearningsolutionslab.com28

gartner.com27

easygenerator.com19

guideflow.com18

ispringsolutions.com17

atomisystems.com15

g2.com15

235 of the 235 domain citations in answers naming Elucidat came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

colossyan.com/posts/elearning-authoring-tools-comparison-chart-for-2026-top-10-tools32

elearningsolutionslab.com/best-elearning-authoring-tools28

confirm.com/blog/elearning-authoring-tools27

gartner.com/reviews/market/elearning-authoring-tools27

collab.thehumanco.org/blog/best-elearning-authoring-tools14

intellum.com/resources/blog/elearning-authoring-tools14

easygenerator.com/en/guides/elearning-software-authoring-tools13

guideflow.com/blog/elearning-authoring-software11

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Elucidat's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Elucidat, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at elucidat.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.