Every category where a model named dominKnow | ONE for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Course authoring tools	Learning and development	0%	21 of 86	10%	10	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for dominKnow | ONE yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated dominKnow | ONE across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	0	2
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative14 labelsNone

Budget-constrained6 labels2

Scale-constrained6 labelsNone

Negative7 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative42 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Need enterprise-scale collaboration & multi-device delivery | dominKnow ONE” MiniMax M2.5 · Course authoring tools · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best for SaaS/B2B Software Simulation: dominKnow | ONE ... is highly rated.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Course authoring tools · direct prompt · alternative

“Choose dominKnow if you need multiple authoring approaches in one platform” Kimi K2 · Course authoring tools · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Over-templatized, high pricing, and restricted customization” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Course authoring tools · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as dominKnow | ONE, over the 42 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and dominKnow | ONE was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Articulate 36038 of 4224Not in the top three

Elucidat34 of 421Not in the top three

Adobe Captivate32 of 421Not in the top three

iSpring Suite29 of 422Not in the top three

Easygenerator28 of 425Not in the top three

Lectora19 of 420Not in the top three

H5P11 of 420Not in the top three

Mindsmith8 of 421Not in the top three

360Learning8 of 420Not in the top three

Articulate Rise 3607 of 424Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named dominKnow | ONE. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 31 of the 42 answers that named dominKnow | ONE and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

colossyan.com23

elearningindustry.com19

confirm.com16

gartner.com16

easygenerator.com15

elearningsolutionslab.com15

guideflow.com13

dominknow.comYour site12

g2.com12

ispringsolutions.com11

140 of the 152 domain citations in answers naming dominKnow | ONE came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

colossyan.com/posts/elearning-authoring-tools-comparison-chart-for-2026-top-10-tools23

gartner.com/reviews/market/elearning-authoring-tools16

confirm.com/blog/elearning-authoring-tools15

elearningsolutionslab.com/best-elearning-authoring-tools15

collab.thehumanco.org/blog/best-elearning-authoring-tools9

easygenerator.com/en/guides/elearning-software-authoring-tools9

elearning.adobe.com/2024/06/comparing-learning-authoring-tools-a-comprehensive-guide7

guideflow.com/blog/elearning-authoring-software7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as dominKnow | ONE

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as dominKnow | ONE; a claim can dispute any of them.

dominKnow ONE 4dominKnow 2DominKnow ONE 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when dominKnow | ONE's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as dominKnow | ONE, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at dominknow.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.