Every category where a model named iSpring Suite for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Course authoring tools	Learning and development	15%	3 of 86	4%	51	accepted challenger
Compliance training	Learning and development	0%	31 of 80	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Traliant at 22%
Learning management systems	Learning and development	0%	30 of 74	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by TalentLMS at 48%
Candidate assessment	Talent acquisition	0%	78 of 101	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by TestGorilla at 68%
Online course libraries	Learning and development	0%	66 of 73	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Udemy Business at 32%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for iSpring Suite yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated iSpring Suite across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	2	1	0	4
GPT-5.4 mini	0	2	1	0	3
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	3	1	1	6
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	3	2	0	6
Mistral Small	0	3	2	0	5
DeepSeek V4 Flash	2	4	1	0	7
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	2	0	3
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	5	1	0	7
Kimi K2	1	2	1	0	4
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	2	1	5
MiniMax M2.5	2	3	0	0	5

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct30 labels8

Paraphrase12 labels1

Comparative30 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained33 labels8

Scale-constrained18 labels1

Negative12 labels2not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative135 labels in all, every segment counted; 18 of the 22 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose iSpring Free if: You already have PowerPoint slides and just need to convert them into standard SCORM courses ... with $0 budget.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Course authoring tools · budget prompt · first choice

“Alternative: iSpring Suite... Start with TalentLMS for deployment and iSpring (or Articulate) for creation.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Course authoring tools · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“I'd recommend starting with iSpring Suite (budget-conscious) or Adobe Captivate (best value for features)” MiniMax M2.5 · Course authoring tools · direct prompt · first choice

“Choose iSpring Suite for the best balance of cost, ease, and features in mid-market” Grok 4.1 Fast · Course authoring tools · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“older legacy versions of Articulate Presenter or older iSpring releases) is obsolete” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Course authoring tools · negative prompt · hard negative

“it is often noted for having a steep learning curve and not being set up well for collaborative working” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Course authoring tools · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as iSpring Suite, over the 129 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and iSpring Suite was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Adobe Captivate92 of 1292Not in the top three

Articulate 36087 of 12950Compare →

Easygenerator54 of 1297Not in the top three

Elucidat46 of 1292Not in the top three

H5P45 of 12910Compare →

Lectora31 of 1290Not in the top three

dominKnow | ONE29 of 1290Not in the top three

Articulate Rise 36027 of 12910Not in the top three

Articulate Storyline26 of 1292Not in the top three

Camtasia16 of 1290Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named iSpring Suite. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 105 of the 129 answers that named iSpring Suite and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

elearningindustry.com63

colossyan.com55

gartner.com55

elearningsolutionslab.com50

confirm.com42

ispringsolutions.com38

guideflow.com31

intellum.com31

lingio.com31

easygenerator.com30

426 of the 426 domain citations in answers naming iSpring Suite came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/elearning-authoring-tools55

colossyan.com/posts/elearning-authoring-tools-comparison-chart-for-2026-top-10-tools53

elearningsolutionslab.com/best-elearning-authoring-tools50

confirm.com/blog/elearning-authoring-tools40

intellum.com/resources/blog/elearning-authoring-tools29

elearningindustry.com/directory/software-categories/elearning-authoring-tools/market/smb28

lingio.com/blog/elearning-authoring-tools28

collab.thehumanco.org/blog/best-elearning-authoring-tools24

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as iSpring Suite

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as iSpring Suite; a claim can dispute any of them.

iSpring Free 5iSpring 4iSpring Suite Max 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when iSpring Suite's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as iSpring Suite, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at ispring.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.