Every category where a model named Easygenerator for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Course authoring tools	Learning and development	2%	11 of 86	10%	21	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Easygenerator yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Easygenerator across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	3	0	0	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	2	0	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	2	0	3
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1	1	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	1	0	2	0	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1	1	3
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct18 labels1

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative20 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained11 labels4

Scale-constrained8 labels3

Negative8 labels2not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative65 labels in all, every segment counted; 8 of the 11 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Small L&D team, heavy SME authoring, need speed | Easygenerator, Elucidat, Rise 360” Kimi K2 · Course authoring tools · scale prompt · first choice

“Choose Easygenerator or Elucidat if you have multiple people (especially non-designers)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Course authoring tools · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best for SME-Led & Rapid Authoring: Easygenerator ... Easygenerator is the best choice.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Course authoring tools · direct prompt · alternative

“Easygenerator prioritizes SME-first speed with SCORM/xAPI support and a built-in LRS” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Course authoring tools · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Elucidat / Easygenerator — cloud platforms that run $1,650+/user/year” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Course authoring tools · budget prompt · hard negative

“Easygenerator (which starts around $1,399/year for one author)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Course authoring tools · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Easygenerator, over the 65 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Easygenerator was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Articulate 36056 of 6534Not in the top three

iSpring Suite54 of 6511Not in the top three

Adobe Captivate53 of 652Not in the top three

Elucidat36 of 651Not in the top three

dominKnow | ONE28 of 651Not in the top three

H5P25 of 655Not in the top three

Lectora19 of 650Not in the top three

Articulate Rise 36015 of 651Not in the top three

Articulate Storyline13 of 652Not in the top three

360Learning9 of 650Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Easygenerator. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 53 of the 65 answers that named Easygenerator and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

colossyan.com43

elearningindustry.com39

elearningsolutionslab.com37

gartner.com35

confirm.com32

easygenerator.comYour site31

ispringsolutions.com24

guideflow.com22

intellum.com22

collab.thehumanco.org19

273 of the 304 domain citations in answers naming Easygenerator came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

colossyan.com/posts/elearning-authoring-tools-comparison-chart-for-2026-top-10-tools43

elearningsolutionslab.com/best-elearning-authoring-tools37

gartner.com/reviews/market/elearning-authoring-tools35

confirm.com/blog/elearning-authoring-tools31

easygenerator.com/en/guides/elearning-software-authoring-tools23

intellum.com/resources/blog/elearning-authoring-tools22

collab.thehumanco.org/blog/best-elearning-authoring-tools19

elearningindustry.com/directory/software-categories/elearning-authoring-tools/market/smb19

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Easygenerator's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Easygenerator, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at easygenerator.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.