HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Field Nation · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Field Nation

10Judge labels

1First choices

1Negative labels

8 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

7 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Field Nation was named 7 times in Contingent workforce man, where SimpleVMS led with 35%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business13 of 85

under the label threshold

Mid-market24 of 97

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In contingent workforce man · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Field Nation for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Contingent workforce management	Workforce planning and analytics	0%	24 of 97	14%	7	under 10 labels · led by SimpleVMS at 35%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Field Nation yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Field Nation across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	1	1	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative6 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labels1

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for: Tight budgets with fast on-site contractor fulfillment” MiniMax M2.5 · Contingent workforce man · budget prompt · alternative

“Best for Tight Budgets & Fast Deployment” Kimi K2 · Contingent workforce man · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Field Nation & WorkMarket (Vetting & Dispersed Accountability)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Contingent workforce man · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Field Nation, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Field Nation was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

SAP Fieldglass8 of 101Not in the top three

Beeline8 of 100Not in the top three

Magnit5 of 103Not in the top three

TalentDesk.io5 of 101Not in the top three

VectorVMS5 of 101Not in the top three

Deel5 of 100Not in the top three

Remote5 of 100Not in the top three

Coupa Contingent Workforce4 of 100Not in the top three

SimplifyVMS4 of 100Not in the top three

Upwork4 of 100Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Field Nation. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 10 answers that named Field Nation and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

worldmetrics.org8

talentdesk.io7

peoplemanagingpeople.com6

gitnux.org5

hrtechsaas.com5

appsruntheworld.com4

learn.g2.com4

aihratlas.com3

rippling.com3

us.fitgap.com3

Forty-eight of the forty-eight domain citations in answers naming Field Nation came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

worldmetrics.org/best/contingent-worker-software8

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-contingent-workforce-management-software6

talentdesk.io/blog/best-contingent-workforce-management-software6

hrtechsaas.com/blog/best-vendor-management-system-contingent-workforce5

worldmetrics.org/best/contingent-workforce-management-software5

appsruntheworld.com/top-10-hcm-software-vendors-in-contingent-labor-management-market-segm4

aihratlas.com/categories/contingent-workforce-management3

gitnux.org/best/contingent-workforce-software3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Field Nation's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Field Nation, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at fieldnation.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.