HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › GoProfiles · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

GoProfiles

11Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

7 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

7 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. GoProfiles was named 7 times in Org charts, where ChartHop led with 27%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business24 of 76

under the label threshold

Mid-market18 of 81

under the label threshold

Enterprise14 of 90

under the label threshold

In org charts · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named GoProfiles for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Org charts and org design	Workforce planning and analytics	0%	18 of 81	0%	7	under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for GoProfiles yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated GoProfiles across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 label1

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative7 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Pick Sift or GoProfiles if the org chart is part of a people directory” Perplexity Sonar · Org charts · comparative prompt · alternative

“Highest-rated (G2 4.8); pairs the chart with profiles, recognitions” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Org charts · comparative prompt · alternative

“Live HRIS sync + employee hub | GoProfiles or Jostle” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Org charts · comparative prompt · alternative

“Look at Pingboard (Workleap), GoProfiles, or Sift” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Org charts · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as GoProfiles, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and GoProfiles was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

ChartHop10 of 113Not in the top three

Pingboard10 of 111Not in the top three

Organimi9 of 111Not in the top three

Lucidchart9 of 110Not in the top three

OrgChart7 of 111Not in the top three

Microsoft Visio5 of 110Not in the top three

Creately4 of 110Not in the top three

Sift4 of 110Not in the top three

Ingentis org.manager3 of 110Not in the top three

SmartDraw3 of 110Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named GoProfiles. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 11 answers that named GoProfiles and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

goprofiles.ioYour site10

theorgchart.com8

forbes.com6

learn.g2.com5

orgchartstudio.com5

peoplemanagingpeople.com5

blog.jostle.me4

gitnux.org4

peerdom.com4

cogniver.com3

Forty-four of the fifty-four domain citations in answers naming GoProfiles came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

goprofiles.io/blog/best-org-chart-software-202610

theorgchart.com/resources/best-org-chart-software8

forbes.com/advisor/business/software/best-org-chart-software6

learn.g2.com/best-org-chart-software5

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-org-chart-tools5

blog.jostle.me/blog/organizational-chart-software4

orgchartstudio.com/blog/best-org-chart-software4

peerdom.com/blog/best-org-chart-software4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as GoProfiles

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as GoProfiles; a claim can dispute any of them.

Sift / GoProfiles 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when GoProfiles's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as GoProfiles, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at goprofiles.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.