HR AI Index
Index Vendors › HROne · September 2026 Edition
3 categories · Named, not ranked

HROne

16Judge labels
1First choices
1Negative labels
8 of 12Models named it
3Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. HROne was named 5 times in Leave and 2 other categories, where BambooHR led with 28%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In leave · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named HROne for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Leave and absence managementCore HR and payroll2%14 of 890%3under 10 labels · led by BambooHR at 28%
Performance managementPerformance and talent management0%40 of 600%1under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 41%
Workforce schedulingCore HR and payroll0%41 of 940%1under 10 labels · led by Deputy at 26%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for HROne yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated HROne across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.510102
GPT-5.4 mini00101
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small02002
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct6 labels1
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative8 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“These are among the leading absence management platforms in 2026” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Leave · direct prompt · first choice
“Best for attendance-driven scheduling with a focus on compliance and frontline workers” Mistral Small · Workforce scheduling · comparative prompt · alternative
“making it ideal for mid-market organizations” Mistral Small · Leave · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as HROne, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and HROne was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Rippling14 of 165Not in the top three
UKG Ready5 of 163Not in the top three
BambooHR5 of 160Not in the top three
Workday4 of 161Not in the top three
Dayforce4 of 160Not in the top three
Deputy3 of 161Not in the top three
Keka3 of 161Not in the top three
Sparrow3 of 161Not in the top three
ADP Workforce Now3 of 160Not in the top three
Connecteam3 of 160Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named HROne. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 16 answers that named HROne and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

learn.g2.com15
worldmetrics.org9
g2.com8
gartner.com8
gitnux.org8
peoplemanagingpeople.com8
apps365.com5
forbes.com5
selectsoftwarereviews.com5
employsome.com4

Seventy-five of the seventy-five domain citations in answers naming HROne came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when HROne's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as HROne, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at hrone.cloud is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.