9 categories · RankedUKG Ready
84Judge labels
25First choices
25Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
9Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
20% in Time and attendance for enterprise buyers
Rank 1 of 90 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
5 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 6% of its 16 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
Small business38 of 73
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market1 of 90
15%16 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise2 of 104
20%15 labels
accepted challenger
In time and attendance · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named UKG Ready for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time and attendance | Core HR and payroll | 15% | 1 of 90 | 6% | 16 | accepted challenger |
| Workforce management suites | Core HR and payroll | 15% | 2 of 95 | 6% | 16 | accepted challenger |
| HRIS and HCM platforms | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 37 of 46 | 50% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 22% |
| Leave and absence management | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 89 of 89 | 67% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by BambooHR at 28% |
| Payroll software | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 25 of 43 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 28% |
| Compensation management | Compensation and total rewards | 0% | 147 of 189 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Pave at 18% |
| HR compliance and policy management | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 69 of 84 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 16% |
| HR help desk and case management | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 60 of 93 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Zoho Desk at 26% |
| Succession planning | Performance and talent management | 0% | 66 of 99 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 31% |
Movement
This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for UKG Ready yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.
By model
How each model treated UKG Ready across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct17 labels8
Paraphrase27 labels12
Comparative7 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained4 labels2
Scale-constrained7 labels3
Negative22 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative84 labels in all, every segment counted; 25 of the 27 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best all-around for mid-market workforce management... For those with complex shift/compliance needs, UKG Ready is the most depth-first choice” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Time and attendance · direct prompt · first choice
“Some of the top-rated options include UKG Ready, which is a strong time and attendance platform for enterprise and mid-market customers.” Llama 4 Maverick · Time and attendance · direct prompt · first choice
“Mid-Market All-in-One | UKG Ready, ADP Workforce Now, Ceridian Dayforce | Robust enough for complexity, strong compliance” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Workforce management sui · scale prompt · first choice
“Request demos from top fits like UKG (great for 50-500 employees), Paycom (all-in-one), or Paylocity (AI scheduling).” Grok 4.1 Fast · Time and attendance · scale prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Has received mostly negative feedback from users, with frequent complaints about the app's poor performance” Claude Haiku 4.5 · HRIS and HCM platforms · negative prompt · hard negative
“Don't start here unless you have complex shift scheduling + payroll + time off needs ... overkill for most B2B service companies” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Time and attendance · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Can feel "heavy" and expensive if you are only managing 100 people. Implementation usually requires a vendor consultant.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Workforce management sui · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“"costly and complex to implement," with a potentially dated interface. May be overkill (and error-prone during setup)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Leave · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as UKG Ready, over the 84 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and UKG Ready was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named UKG Ready. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 77 of the 84 answers that named UKG Ready and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
peoplemanagingpeople.com38
learn.g2.com37
g2.com36
forbes.com31
gartner.com23
capterra.com18
worldmetrics.org17
selectsoftwarereviews.com16
guideflow.com15
paylocity.com13
244 of the 244 domain citations in answers naming UKG Ready came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Names read as UKG Ready
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as UKG Ready; a claim can dispute any of them.
UKG Ready (Ultimate Kronos Group) 2UKG Ready (formerly Kronos) 2
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when UKG Ready's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as UKG Ready, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at ukg.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.