HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Insala · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Insala

2Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

1 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Insala was named 1 time in Mentoring software, where Together led with 37%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market39 of 55

under the label threshold

Enterprise19 of 34

under the label threshold

In mentoring software · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Insala for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Mentoring software	Learning and development	0%	39 of 55	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Together at 37%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Insala yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Insala across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Insala, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Insala was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

MentorcliQ2 of 22Not in the top three

Chronus2 of 21Not in the top three

Guider2 of 20Not in the top three

Mentorloop2 of 20Not in the top three

Qooper2 of 20Not in the top three

Ten Thousand Coffees2 of 20Not in the top three

Together2 of 20Not in the top three

Torch2 of 20Not in the top three

ADPList1 of 20Not in the top three

Brancher1 of 20Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Insala. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named Insala and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

chronus.com2

gartner.com2

guideflow.com2

hrlineup.com2

brancher.com.au1

businesswire.com1

capterra.com1

emergimentors.com.au1

f6s.com1

hs.tenthousandcoffees.com1

Fourteen of the fourteen domain citations in answers naming Insala came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

chronus.com/blog/top-mentoring-platforms2

gartner.com/reviews/market/mentoring-software2

guideflow.com/blog/mentoring-software2

hrlineup.com/top-mentorship-software2

brancher.com.au/blog/best-mentoring-software1

businesswire.com/news/home/20250624555106/en/10KC-Launches-Mentorship-Reporting-and-Analyt1

capterra.com/p/177744/Together1

emergimentors.com.au/blog/top-10-online-mentoring-platforms-in-2024-11

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Insala's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Insala, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at insala.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.