Every category where a model named Microsoft 365 for Frontline Workers for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Frontline employee apps	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	21 of 97	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Connecteam at 56%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Microsoft 365 for Frontline Workers yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Microsoft 365 for Frontline Workers across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 label1

Comparative10 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Native Microsoft ecosystem integration | Microsoft 365 for Frontline Workers” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Frontline employee apps · comparative prompt · alternative

“Already Microsoft-based? → Microsoft 365 for Frontline Workers” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Frontline employee apps · comparative prompt · alternative

“Microsoft shop: Microsoft 365 for Frontline Workers” Kimi K2 · Frontline employee apps · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Microsoft 365 for Frontline Workers, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Microsoft 365 for Frontline Workers was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Connecteam12 of 153Not in the top three

Blink11 of 152Not in the top three

WorkJam11 of 152Not in the top three

Staffbase11 of 151Not in the top three

Beekeeper10 of 150Not in the top three

YOOBIC7 of 150Not in the top three

Flip6 of 151Not in the top three

MangoApps6 of 151Not in the top three

Firstup6 of 150Not in the top three

Speakap6 of 150Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Microsoft 365 for Frontline Workers. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 15 answers that named Microsoft 365 for Frontline Workers and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com11

mangoapps.com11

staffbase.com10

redeapp.com8

changeengine.com7

crewcheck.io6

getzelos.com5

microsoft.comYour site5

joinblink.com4

turnonwork.com4

Sixty-six of the seventy-one domain citations in answers naming Microsoft 365 for Frontline Workers came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/frontline-worker-software10

staffbase.com/blog/frontline-communication-tools10

mangoapps.com/articles/frontline-communication-platforms-guide9

redeapp.com/blog/best-employee-communication-apps-frontline-workers8

changeengine.com/articles/frontline-communication-tools7

crewcheck.io/blog/best-frontline-employee-communication-apps6

mangoapps.com/articles/best-employee-app-software6

getzelos.com/best-frontline-employee-apps5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Microsoft 365 for Frontline Workers

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Microsoft 365 for Frontline Workers; a claim can dispute any of them.

Microsoft 365 Frontline 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Microsoft 365 for Frontline Workers's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Microsoft 365 for Frontline Workers, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at microsoft.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.