Every category where a model named YOOBIC for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Frontline employee apps	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	19 of 97	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by Connecteam at 56%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for YOOBIC yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated YOOBIC across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	2	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative11 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative18 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Running retail stores with execution checklists? → YOOBIC or Zipline” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Frontline employee apps · comparative prompt · alternative

“Execution & mobile forms for frontline crews | YOOBIC” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Frontline employee apps · comparative prompt · alternative

“WorkJam or YOOBIC add strong compliance features” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Frontline employee apps · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as YOOBIC, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and YOOBIC was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Beekeeper18 of 183Not in the top three

Connecteam18 of 183Not in the top three

Blink18 of 181Not in the top three

Staffbase18 of 180Not in the top three

WorkJam16 of 182Not in the top three

MangoApps12 of 181Not in the top three

Firstup12 of 180Not in the top three

Flip10 of 180Not in the top three

Speakap9 of 180Not in the top three

Microsoft 365 for Frontline Workers7 of 180Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named YOOBIC. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 18 answers that named YOOBIC and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

mangoapps.com17

changeengine.com13

staffbase.com13

guideflow.com10

crewcheck.io9

getzelos.com9

redeapp.com8

joinblink.com7

turnonwork.com5

agilityportal.io4

Ninety-five of the ninety-five domain citations in answers naming YOOBIC came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

mangoapps.com/articles/frontline-communication-platforms-guide14

changeengine.com/articles/frontline-communication-tools13

staffbase.com/blog/frontline-communication-tools11

guideflow.com/blog/frontline-worker-software10

mangoapps.com/articles/best-frontline-communication-software10

crewcheck.io/blog/best-frontline-employee-communication-apps9

getzelos.com/best-frontline-employee-apps9

redeapp.com/blog/best-employee-communication-apps-frontline-workers8

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when YOOBIC's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as YOOBIC, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at yoobic.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.