Every category where a model named Speakap for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Frontline employee apps	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	14 of 97	0%	10	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Speakap yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Speakap across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	1	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative10 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Recommended for mid-market frontline industries wanting a white-label app with multilingual support” Perplexity Sonar · Frontline employee apps · direct prompt · alternative

“Speakap is particularly well-suited for mid-market buyers.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Frontline employee apps · direct prompt · alternative

“Social intranet with employee-driven content | Speakap” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Frontline employee apps · comparative prompt · alternative

“Strengths: Quick deployment, white-label options available” MiniMax M2.5 · Frontline employee apps · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Speakap, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Speakap was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Connecteam17 of 175Not in the top three

Blink15 of 172Not in the top three

Staffbase15 of 170Not in the top three

WorkJam12 of 174Not in the top three

Beekeeper12 of 173Not in the top three

MangoApps9 of 172Not in the top three

YOOBIC9 of 171Not in the top three

Firstup9 of 170Not in the top three

Flip9 of 170Not in the top three

Microsoft 365 for Frontline Workers6 of 171Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Speakap. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 17 answers that named Speakap and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

mangoapps.com14

guideflow.com12

changeengine.com11

staffbase.com10

getzelos.com9

redeapp.com7

joinblink.com6

crewcheck.io5

viewpointanalysis.com5

sociabble.com4

Eighty-three of the eighty-three domain citations in answers naming Speakap came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

mangoapps.com/articles/best-frontline-communication-software12

changeengine.com/articles/frontline-communication-tools11

getzelos.com/best-frontline-employee-apps9

guideflow.com/blog/frontline-worker-software9

mangoapps.com/articles/frontline-communication-platforms-guide9

staffbase.com/blog/frontline-communication-tools8

mangoapps.com/articles/best-employee-app-software7

redeapp.com/blog/best-employee-communication-apps-frontline-workers7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Speakap's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Speakap, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at speakap.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.