HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Microsoft SharePoint + Viva Connections · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Microsoft SharePoint + Viva Connections

5Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

4 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Microsoft SharePoint + Viva Connections was named 3 times in Internal communications, where Happeo led with 16%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market31 of 80

under the label threshold

Enterprise52 of 73

under the label threshold

In internal communications · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Microsoft SharePoint + Viva Connections for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Internal communications and intranet	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	31 of 80	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Happeo at 16%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Microsoft SharePoint + Viva Connections yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Microsoft SharePoint + Viva Connections across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	2	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“weaker at delivering a personalized employee experience and often requires significant configuration/ongoing governance” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Internal communications · direct prompt · alternative

“Already on Microsoft 365? → SharePoint + Viva for cost-effectiveness and integration.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Internal communications · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Microsoft SharePoint + Viva Connections, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Microsoft SharePoint + Viva Connections was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Simpplr5 of 52Not in the top three

Happeo3 of 51Not in the top three

Workvivo3 of 51Not in the top three

MangoApps3 of 50Not in the top three

Staffbase2 of 51Not in the top three

Atlassian Confluence2 of 50Not in the top three

Firstup2 of 50Not in the top three

Interact2 of 50Not in the top three

Unily2 of 50Not in the top three

Blink1 of 50Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Microsoft SharePoint + Viva Connections. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 5 answers that named Microsoft SharePoint + Viva Connections and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gartner.com3

learn.g2.com3

mangoapps.com3

peoplemanagingpeople.com3

simpplr.com3

guideflow.com2

joinblink.com2

workvivo.com2

atlassian.com1

clinked.com1

Twenty-three of the twenty-three domain citations in answers naming Microsoft SharePoint + Viva Connections came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/intranet-packaged-solutions3

learn.g2.com/best-employee-intranet-software3

mangoapps.com/articles/top-modern-intranet-platforms-of-20243

simpplr.com/blog/2024/best-intranet-platforms3

guideflow.com/blog/employee-intranet-software2

joinblink.com/intelligence/top-intranet-software-providers2

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-intranet-software2

atlassian.com/blog/confluence/vs-sharepoint1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Microsoft SharePoint + Viva Connections

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Microsoft SharePoint + Viva Connections; a claim can dispute any of them.

Microsoft SharePoint / Viva Connections 2

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Microsoft SharePoint + Viva Connections's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Microsoft SharePoint + Viva Connections, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at microsoft.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.