HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Native Teams · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Native Teams

13Judge labels

2First choices

3Negative labels

8 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

7 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Native Teams was named 7 times in Global payroll, where Deel led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business13 of 42

under the label threshold

Mid-market8 of 66

under the label threshold

Enterprise49 of 54

under the label threshold

In global payroll · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Native Teams for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Global payroll and employer of record	Core HR and payroll	4%	8 of 66	14%	7	under 10 labels · led by Deel at 22%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Native Teams yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Native Teams across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	0	1
Kimi K2	1	0	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative6 labelsNone

Budget-constrained5 labels2

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Native Teams is widely recognized as the most affordable main-stream EOR provider available today.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Global payroll · budget prompt · first choice

“For the absolute tightest budget: Native Teams at ~$99/month” Kimi K2 · Global payroll · budget prompt · first choice

“If you're primarily hiring in Europe, Native Teams at $99/employee/month is the most cost-effective choice.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Global payroll · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“described as leaner tools that may trade off coverage depth or support quality for lower cost” Perplexity Sonar · Global payroll · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Native Teams, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Native Teams was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

RemoFirst11 of 132Not in the top three

Deel10 of 134Not in the top three

Remote10 of 131Not in the top three

Multiplier7 of 131Not in the top three

Papaya Global6 of 131Not in the top three

Remote People6 of 131Not in the top three

Oyster6 of 130Not in the top three

Rippling6 of 130Not in the top three

G-P4 of 130Not in the top three

Tarmack2 of 131Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Native Teams. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 13 answers that named Native Teams and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

teamed.global10

eorhq.com9

nativeteams.comYour site9

peoplemanagingpeople.com9

remotepeople.com8

anywherer.com6

gartner.com5

hrstacks.com5

remofirst.com5

tarmack.com5

Sixty-two of the seventy-one domain citations in answers naming Native Teams came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

teamed.global/compare/best-eor-providers-20267

remotepeople.com/providers/best-eor6

anywherer.com/best-eor-for-small-businesses5

gartner.com/reviews/market/employer-of-record-eor5

hrstacks.com/employer-of-record5

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-eor-for-small-business5

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-global-payroll-solutions5

remofirst.com/post/employer-of-record-companies5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Native Teams's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Native Teams, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at nativeteams.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.