HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Remote People · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Remote People

15Judge labels

2First choices

0Negative labels

9 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

7 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Remote People was named 7 times in Global payroll, where Deel led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business7 of 42

under the label threshold

Mid-market14 of 66

under the label threshold

Enterprise23 of 54

under the label threshold

In global payroll · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Remote People for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Global payroll and employer of record	Core HR and payroll	0%	14 of 66	0%	7	under 10 labels · led by Deel at 22%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Remote People yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Remote People across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	2	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 label1

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative4 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained10 labels1

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“RemotePeople – Best overall EOR with combined recruitment, employment, and expansion support” MiniMax M2.5 · Global payroll · comparative prompt · first choice

“If you want more personalized legal and HR guidance ... choose RemotePeople.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Global payroll · budget prompt · alternative

“RemotePeople is also cited as a budget-conscious pick at around $199/month” Perplexity Sonar · Global payroll · budget prompt · alternative

“Best all-round EOR, combining recruitment, employment, and expansion support.” Mistral Small · Global payroll · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Remote People, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Remote People was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

RemoFirst13 of 153Not in the top three

Deel12 of 153Not in the top three

Remote11 of 150Not in the top three

Multiplier7 of 150Not in the top three

Oyster7 of 150Not in the top three

Rippling7 of 150Not in the top three

Native Teams6 of 151Not in the top three

Papaya Global6 of 151Not in the top three

Hire with Columbus5 of 151Not in the top three

G-P5 of 150Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Remote People. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 15 answers that named Remote People and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

peoplemanagingpeople.com8

remotepeople.com8

teamed.global8

gartner.com7

remofirst.com7

herohunt.ai6

employborderless.com5

eoroverview.com5

hirewithcolumbus.com5

employsome.com4

Sixty-three of the sixty-three domain citations in answers naming Remote People came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/employer-of-record-eor7

herohunt.ai/blog/the-best-employer-of-record-providers6

remofirst.com/post/employer-of-record-companies6

hirewithcolumbus.com/best/cheapest-employer-of-record5

remotepeople.com/providers/best-eor5

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-eor-for-small-business4

remotepeople.com/blog/cheapest-employer-of-record4

tech.co/hr-software/best-employer-of-record-services4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Remote People

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Remote People; a claim can dispute any of them.

RemotePeople 4RemoFirst/RemotePeople 1RemotePeople (formerly Horizons) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Remote People's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Remote People, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at remote.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.