HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Ongig · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Ongig

7Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

6 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Ongig was named 3 times in Recruitment marketing, where Teamtailor led with 16%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market15 of 81

under the label threshold

Enterprise19 of 72

under the label threshold

In recruitment marketing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Ongig for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Recruitment marketing and career sites	Talent acquisition	2%	15 of 81	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Teamtailor at 16%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Ongig yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Ongig across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase7 labels1

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Ongig or Greenhouse are top choices” Mistral Small · Recruitment marketing · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Choose Ongig if your main need is a career site layer on top of an existing ATS” Perplexity Sonar · Recruitment marketing · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Ongig acts as a beautiful frontend "wrapper" for your ATS.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Recruitment marketing · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Ongig, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Ongig was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Phenom6 of 74Not in the top three

iCIMS5 of 70Not in the top three

SmartRecruiters3 of 70Not in the top three

Pinpoint2 of 71Not in the top three

Avature2 of 70Not in the top three

Greenhouse2 of 70Not in the top three

Lever2 of 70Not in the top three

Symphony Talent2 of 70Not in the top three

Workable2 of 70Not in the top three

Teamtailor1 of 71Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Ongig. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 7 answers that named Ongig and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

blog.ongig.comYour site6

joveo.com6

mokahr.io6

hire.page5

ongig.comYour site4

selectsoftwarereviews.com3

avature.net2

paradox.ai2

pinpointhq.com2

resources.rework.com2

Twenty-eight of the thirty-eight domain citations in answers naming Ongig came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

blog.ongig.com/candidate-experience/best-career-site-builder6

joveo.com/blog/best-career-site-builders6

hire.page/blog/best-career-page-builders-20265

mokahr.io/articles/en/the-best-career-site-builder5

mokahr.io/articles/en/the-best-branded-careers-site-builder4

ongig.com/career-site-builder4

mokahr.io/articles/en/the-best-career-page-builder3

selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/best-recruitment-website-builders3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Ongig

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Ongig; a claim can dispute any of them.

Ongig Career Site Builder 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Ongig's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Ongig, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at ongig.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.