HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Oracle Fusion HCM Analytics · September 2026 Edition

Oracle Fusion HCM · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Oracle Fusion HCM Analytics

11Judge labels

0First choices

7Negative labels

7 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Oracle Fusion HCM Analytics was named 4 times in People analytics, where HiBob led with 15%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business89 of 96

under the label threshold

Mid-market96 of 99

under the label threshold

Enterprise22 of 71

under the label threshold

In people analytics · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Oracle Fusion HCM Analytics for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
People analytics	Workforce planning and analytics	0%	96 of 99	75%	4	under 10 labels · led by HiBob at 15%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Oracle Fusion HCM Analytics yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Oracle Fusion HCM Analytics across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative7 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“avoid it if you are *not* already in the Oracle ecosystem” Perplexity Sonar · People analytics · negative prompt · hard negative

“These tools are great at reporting on data already sitting inside their own ecosystems, but they struggle elsewhere.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · People analytics · negative prompt · soft negative

“notoriously expensive and painful to implement” DeepSeek V4 Flash · People analytics · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Oracle Fusion HCM Analytics, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oracle Fusion HCM Analytics was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Visier11 of 113Not in the top three

One Model10 of 112Not in the top three

Workday People Analytics9 of 110Not in the top three

Crunchr6 of 110Not in the top three

BambooHR5 of 111Not in the top three

ChartHop4 of 110Not in the top three

SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Analytics4 of 110Not in the top three

Eletive3 of 111Not in the top three

Leapsome3 of 111Not in the top three

Qualtrics EmployeeXM3 of 110Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Oracle Fusion HCM Analytics. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 11 answers that named Oracle Fusion HCM Analytics and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

hrbench.com8

adp.com7

thrivesparrow.com7

eletive.com6

workhuman.com6

bangaloreorbit.com4

hr.university4

agile-hr-analytics.com3

firsthr.app3

g2.com3

Fifty-one of the fifty-one domain citations in answers naming Oracle Fusion HCM Analytics came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

hrbench.com/blog/best-people-analytics-software8

thrivesparrow.com/blog/best-people-analytics-software7

adp.com/resources/articles-and-insights/articles/p/people-analytics-pitfalls.aspx6

eletive.com/blog/people-analytics-tools6

workhuman.com/blog/people-analytics-software6

bangaloreorbit.com/blog/top-10-hr-analytics-platforms-features-pros-cons-comparison4

hr.university/tools/hr-analytics-software4

agile-hr-analytics.com/top-people-analytics-tools-2026-comparison-guide3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Oracle Fusion HCM Analytics

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Oracle Fusion HCM Analytics; a claim can dispute any of them.

Oracle HCM Analytics 4

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Oracle Fusion HCM Analytics's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Oracle Fusion HCM Analytics, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at oracle.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.