HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Analytics · September 2026 Edition

SAP · 1 category · Ranked

SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Analytics

15Judge labels

0First choices

5Negative labels

9 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Best standing

0% in People analytics for enterprise buyers

Rank 94 of 99 in the mid-market standing

0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 75% of its 4 labels there were negative.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business80 of 96

under the label threshold

Mid-market94 of 99

under the label threshold

Enterprise10 of 71

accepted challenger

In people analytics · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Analytics for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
People analytics	Workforce planning and analytics	0%	94 of 99	75%	4	under 10 labels · led by HiBob at 15%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Analytics yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Analytics across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative8 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Outside of that ecosystem, implementation is difficult... G2 reviews highlight customer support as a major grievance” GLM 4.7 FlashX · People analytics · negative prompt · soft negative

“such as Workday People Analytics or SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Analytics ... avoid rigid enterprise-scale tools” Gemini 3.5 Flash · People analytics · negative prompt · soft negative

“G2 rating of 4.0/5 (lower than competitors), complex for non-SAP ecosystems, steep learning curve” Kimi K2 · People analytics · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Analytics, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Analytics was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Visier15 of 1510Not in the top three

Workday People Analytics13 of 150Not in the top three

One Model12 of 154Not in the top three

ChartHop7 of 151Not in the top three

Crunchr7 of 151Not in the top three

Culture Amp4 of 150Not in the top three

Oracle Fusion HCM Analytics4 of 150Not in the top three

BambooHR2 of 150Not in the top three

Eightfold AI2 of 150Not in the top three

Hubstaff2 of 150Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Analytics. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 15 answers that named SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Analytics and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

hrbench.com10

eletive.com9

peoplemanagingpeople.com9

workhuman.com9

thrivesparrow.com8

firsthr.app7

hr.university7

agile-hr-analytics.com6

cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com6

ovi-me.com6

Seventy-seven of the seventy-seven domain citations in answers naming SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Analytics came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

hrbench.com/blog/best-people-analytics-software10

eletive.com/blog/people-analytics-tools9

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-people-analytics-software9

workhuman.com/blog/people-analytics-software9

thrivesparrow.com/blog/best-people-analytics-software8

firsthr.app/compare/general/hr-analytics-software7

hr.university/tools/hr-analytics-software7

cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com/tools/10-best-hr-analytics-tools-for-enterprises/133883576

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Analytics's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Analytics, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sap.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.