Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 5% now.
5%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 5 of 125, unchanged
1 category · Named, not rankedProfessional.me Internal Mobility
9Judge labels
4First choices
0Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Professional.me Internal Mobility was named 4 times in Internal talent marketpl, where Fuel50 led with 47%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business7 of 129
4%4 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market6 of 102
4%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise33 of 86
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In internal talent marketpl · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Professional.me Internal Mobility for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal talent marketplace | Performance and talent management | 4% | 6 of 102 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Fuel50 at 47% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 5% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Professional.me Internal Mobility held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · Internal talent marketpl · by segment
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 5% now.
5%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 6 of 93, unchanged
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 29 of 76, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal talent marketpl | 0% | 5% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 5% now. | New this edition | Rank 6 of 102, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Professional.me Internal Mobility across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Professional.me Internal Mobility across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase1 label1
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained7 labels3
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best low‑cost paid option: Professional.me Internal Mobility at $6/employee/month (transparent, scalable, includes integrations and retention intelligence).” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Internal talent marketpl · budget prompt · first choice
“Best Overall Value ... best balance of functionality and cost” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Internal talent marketpl · budget prompt · first choice
“Fuel50 and Professional.me offer transparent pricing starting as low as $4.54 per user/year and $6/month respectively” Mistral Small · Internal talent marketpl · budget prompt · alternative
“Professional.me's $6/employee/mo Acquire & Retain tier is the lowest transparent per-employee paid option” Muse Glimmer 30B · Internal talent marketpl · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Professional.me Internal Mobility, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Professional.me Internal Mobility was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Professional.me Internal Mobility, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Professional.me Internal Mobility was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Professional.me Internal Mobility. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 9 answers that named Professional.me Internal Mobility and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
itechguides.com9
sourceforge.net8
peoplemanagingpeople.com7
firsthr.app5
sprad.io5
engagedly.com4
omr.com4
pin.com4
professional.meYour site4
awesomic.com3
Forty-nine of the fifty-three domain citations in answers naming Professional.me Internal Mobility came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on professional.me
590
subdomains included
Content
69
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
54 · 12
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 51 | undated | Applicant tracking syste, Talent intelligence | ||
| News or press | 15 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 3 | undated |
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page professional.me exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.
Names read as Professional.me Internal Mobility
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Professional.me Internal Mobility; a claim can dispute any of them.
Professional.me 1
Follow Professional.me Internal Mobility
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Professional.me Internal Mobility is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Professional.me Internal Mobility is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Match every open role to qualified internal candidates first. Map career paths from real movement data and turn your workforce into a talent marketplace.
- For
- CHROs, TA leaders, and technical teams
- Price stated
- Per Position $200/role; Acquire & Retain $6/employee/mo; Develop & Succeed $10/employee/mo professional.me/en/platform/internal-mobility
- Starting price
- 200/role professional.me/en/platform/internal-mobility
- Free plan or trial
- ابدأ مجانًا professional.me/ar/integrations
- Integrations claimed
- 40 professional.me/ar/platform
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type IIGDPRSOC 2
- Customers named
- WorkdaySuccessFactorsOracle HCMGreenhouseiCIMSIbrahim HaidarGeneral Engineering Company, Lebanon
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What Professional.me Internal Mobility's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: professional.me/en/platform/internal-mobility, professional.me, professional.me/ar/pricing, professional.me/ar/platform, professional.me/ar/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Professional.me Internal Mobility's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Professional.me Internal Mobility, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Professional.me Internal Mobility by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Professional.me Internal Mobility is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Professional.me Internal Mobility, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.