Every category where a model named Recruitee for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Recruitment marketing and career sites	Talent acquisition	0%	23 of 81	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by Teamtailor at 16%
Applicant tracking systems	Talent acquisition	0%	19 of 50	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Greenhouse at 47%
Interview scheduling	Talent acquisition	0%	48 of 72	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Calendly at 21%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Recruitee yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Recruitee across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	2	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	2	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	2
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative5 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained9 labelsNone

Negative8 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative33 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Recruitee (Tellent) and TalentLyft — Collaborative, all-in-one recruiting + CRM/marketing suites” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Recruitment marketing · comparative prompt · alternative

“Collaborative platform with strong marketing tools like branded sites and sourcing” Grok 4.1 Fast · Recruitment marketing · direct prompt · alternative

“If you need strong team collaboration features, choose Recruitee.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Recruitment marketing · direct prompt · alternative

“Recruitee – Collaborative hiring with solid marketing features” MiniMax M2.5 · Recruitment marketing · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Recruitee, over the 33 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Recruitee was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Workable17 of 333Not in the top three

Greenhouse14 of 331Not in the top three

Lever14 of 330Not in the top three

JazzHR12 of 332Not in the top three

Calendly9 of 335Not in the top three

Breezy HR9 of 331Not in the top three

Phenom9 of 331Not in the top three

TalentLyft9 of 331Not in the top three

Beamery8 of 330Not in the top three

Manatal7 of 332Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Recruitee. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 30 of the 33 answers that named Recruitee and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

selectsoftwarereviews.com18

learn.g2.com16

g2.com13

hiretruffle.com13

peoplemanagingpeople.com10

recruitcompare.io10

joveo.com8

recruitee.comYour site8

candidate.fyi7

capterra.com7

102 of the 110 domain citations in answers naming Recruitee came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

learn.g2.com/best-recruitment-marketing-platforms11

hiretruffle.com/blog/interview-scheduling-tools9

recruitcompare.io/best/best-recruitment-marketing-platforms9

selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/recruitment-marketing-software9

lever.co/insights/best-interview-scheduling-software7

joveo.com/blog/top-recruitment-marketing-platforms6

candidate.fyi/interview-scheduling-software5

g2.com/categories/recruitment-marketing5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Recruitee

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Recruitee; a claim can dispute any of them.

Recruitee (Tellent) 2Recruitee (now Tellent) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Recruitee's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Recruitee, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at recruitee.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.