Every category where a model named SAP SuccessFactors Compensation for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Compensation management	Compensation and total rewards	0%	61 of 189	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Pave at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SAP SuccessFactors Compensation yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SAP SuccessFactors Compensation across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	1	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct9 labelsNone

Paraphrase7 labelsNone

Comparative14 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained4 labels1

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative36 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best if you're already in SAP HCM: SAP SuccessFactors Compensation” GPT-5.4 mini · Compensation management · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SAP SuccessFactors Compensation, over the 26 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SAP SuccessFactors Compensation was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

beqom25 of 2614Not in the top three

Workday Compensation21 of 2612Not in the top three

Payscale18 of 261Not in the top three

CaptivateIQ13 of 262Not in the top three

Salary.com11 of 260Not in the top three

HRSoft10 of 260Not in the top three

Oracle Fusion Cloud Compensation10 of 260Not in the top three

Darwinbox Compensation Management9 of 261Not in the top three

Xactly8 of 260Not in the top three

CompLogix7 of 261Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SAP SuccessFactors Compensation. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 26 of the 26 answers that named SAP SuccessFactors Compensation and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gartner.com20

darwinbox.com19

comprehensive.io17

bestrecruitingtools.com14

guideflow.com14

captivateiq.com13

learn.g2.com13

g2.com11

peoplemanagingpeople.com11

worldmetrics.org10

142 of the 142 domain citations in answers naming SAP SuccessFactors Compensation came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

darwinbox.com/blog/8-best-compensation-management-software-enterprises19

gartner.com/reviews/market/compensation-management-software19

comprehensive.io/content/best-compensation-management-software17

bestrecruitingtools.com/blog/best-compensation-management-software-enterprise-202614

captivateiq.com/blog/best-compensation-management-software12

learn.g2.com/best-compensation-management-software12

guideflow.com/blog/compensation-management-software11

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-compensation-management-software10

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SAP SuccessFactors Compensation's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SAP SuccessFactors Compensation, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sap.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.