HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Skima AI · September 2026 Edition

Skima · 5 categories · Named, not ranked

Skima AI

11Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

7 of 12Models named it

5Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

9 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Skima AI was named 9 times in AI recruiting assistants and 4 other categories, where GoPerfect led with 19%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market37 of 84

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In ai recruiting assistants · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Skima AI for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
AI recruiting assistants	Talent acquisition	0%	37 of 84	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by GoPerfect at 19%
Internal talent marketplace	Performance and talent management	0%	65 of 129	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Fuel50 at 26%
Job advertising and distribution	Talent acquisition	0%	36 of 109	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by JobTarget at 21%
Talent intelligence	Performance and talent management	0%	33 of 77	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Pin at 17%
Skills intelligence	Performance and talent management	0%	105 of 162	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by TalentGuard at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Skima AI yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Skima AI across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	2	3
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	2
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative7 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Mid-market and enterprise recruiting teams with large candidate databases get the most value from Skima AI” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Talent intelligence · direct prompt · alternative

“Skima AI or similar tools can streamline multi‑board posting and matching.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Job advertising · comparative prompt · alternative

“Choose Skima AI if explainable, bias-aware screening is a priority” MiniMax M2.5 · AI recruiting assistants · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Skima AI, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Skima AI was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Eightfold AI7 of 110Not in the top three

Pin5 of 111Not in the top three

Beamery4 of 110Not in the top three

Gloat4 of 110Not in the top three

Gem3 of 110Not in the top three

SeekOut3 of 110Not in the top three

Workday3 of 110Not in the top three

hireEZ3 of 110Not in the top three

Indeed2 of 112Not in the top three

365Talents2 of 111Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Skima AI. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 11 answers that named Skima AI and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

skima.aiYour site9

g2.com6

pin.com6

fuel50.com4

engagedly.com3

gartner.com3

metaview.ai3

noon.ai3

bestrecruitingtools.com2

blog.imocha.io2

Thirty-two of the forty-one domain citations in answers naming Skima AI came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

pin.com/blog/talent-intelligence-platforms4

pin.com/blog/talent-intelligence-software4

skima.ai/blog/industry-trends-and-insights/talent-intelligence-tools4

engagedly.com/blog/best-talent-mobility-softwares3

fuel50.com/blog/talent-marketplace-software3

gartner.com/reviews/market/internal-talent-marketplaces3

skima.ai/blog/product-deep-dives/best-talent-marketplace-platforms3

bestrecruitingtools.com/blog/best-talent-intelligence-platforms-enterprise-20262

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Skima AI

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Skima AI; a claim can dispute any of them.

Skima 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Skima AI's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Skima AI, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at skima.ai is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.