Every category where a model named Sprad for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Internal talent marketplace	Performance and talent management	2%	10 of 129	0%	9	under 10 labels · led by Fuel50 at 26%
360 feedback	Performance and talent management	0%	59 of 77	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 40%
AI recruiting assistants	Talent acquisition	0%	48 of 84	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by GoPerfect at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Sprad yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Sprad across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	2	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	1	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labels1

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative12 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Sprad - Often fits EU/DACH mid-market rollouts with desk + deskless needs and strong internal mobility workflows.” Llama 4 Maverick · Internal talent marketpl · direct prompt · first choice

“Sprad is another strong contender, especially for EU/DACH mid-market companies” Mistral Small · Internal talent marketpl · direct prompt · alternative

“If you plan to grow: Sprad lets you start free and add AI features later” Kimi K2 · AI recruiting assistants · budget prompt · alternative

“or Sprad.io if you are in the EU/DACH region and need transparent pricing” Mistral Small · Internal talent marketpl · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Sprad, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Sprad was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

365Talents6 of 125Not in the top three

Fuel506 of 122Not in the top three

Gloat6 of 121Not in the top three

Eightfold AI4 of 120Not in the top three

Phenom4 of 120Not in the top three

TalentGuard4 of 120Not in the top three

Workday3 of 120Not in the top three

Engagedly2 of 121Not in the top three

15Five2 of 120Not in the top three

Lattice2 of 120Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Sprad. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 12 answers that named Sprad and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

sprad.ioYour site12

gartner.com8

fuel50.com7

worldmetrics.org7

engagedly.com6

docebo.com5

tophrsoftware.com5

talentguard.com4

zendikt.com4

g2.com3

Forty-nine of the sixty-one domain citations in answers naming Sprad came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

sprad.io/blog/internal-talent-marketplace-software-in-2025-vendors-features-pricing-and-rf9

fuel50.com/blog/internal-talent-marketplace-platforms7

gartner.com/reviews/market/internal-talent-marketplaces7

engagedly.com/blog/best-talent-mobility-softwares6

worldmetrics.org/best/internal-mobility-software6

docebo.com/learning-network/blog/internal-mobility-platforms5

sprad.io/blog/internal-mobility-software-in-2025-top-platforms-compared-use-cases-and-rfp-5

tophrsoftware.com/tools/best-talent-marketplace-software5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Sprad

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Sprad; a claim can dispute any of them.

Sprad.io 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Sprad's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Sprad, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sprad.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.