HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › SysAid · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

SysAid

3Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

3 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. SysAid was named 3 times in HR help desk, where Zoho Desk led with 26%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market12 of 93

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In hr help desk · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named SysAid for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
HR help desk and case management	Onboarding and employee experience	2%	12 of 93	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Zoho Desk at 26%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SysAid yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SysAid across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labels1

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best overall mid-market: SysAid (8.7–8.8/10, configurable workflows, SLA control, audit trails).” GLM 4.7 FlashX · HR help desk · direct prompt · first choice

“SysAid — strong mid-market option” DeepSeek V4 Flash · HR help desk · scale prompt · alternative

“Rated 8.7/10 for mid-market” Kimi K2 · HR help desk · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SysAid, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SysAid was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

HappyFox Help Desk3 of 30Not in the top three

Freshservice2 of 31Not in the top three

Hiver2 of 30Not in the top three

InvGate Service Management2 of 30Not in the top three

Zendesk2 of 30Not in the top three

Zoho Desk2 of 30Not in the top three

Featurebase1 of 30Not in the top three

Help Scout1 of 30Not in the top three

ServiceNow1 of 30Not in the top three

ServiceNow HR Service Delivery1 of 30Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SysAid. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 3 answers that named SysAid and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

featurebase.app3

worldmetrics.org3

gitnux.org2

hiverhq.com2

learn.g2.com2

siit.io2

zendesk.com2

zipdo.co2

applaudhr.com1

apps365.com1

Twenty of the twenty domain citations in answers naming SysAid came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

featurebase.app/blog/hr-help-desk-ticketing-system3

worldmetrics.org/best/hr-help-desk-software3

gitnux.org/best/hr-help-desk-software2

hiverhq.com/help-desk-software/hr2

learn.g2.com/hr-software-for-mid-sized-companies2

siit.io/blog/best-hr-ticketing-systems2

zendesk.com/employee-service/hr-help-desk-software2

zipdo.co/best/hr-help-desk-software2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SysAid's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SysAid, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sysaid.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.