| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR compliance and policy management | Core HR and payroll | 2% | 23 of 84 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 16% |
| HRIS and HCM platforms | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 14 of 46 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 22% |
| People analytics | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 34 of 99 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by HiBob at 15% |
| Applicant tracking systems | Talent acquisition | 0% | 26 of 50 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Greenhouse at 47% |
| Leave and absence management | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 67 of 89 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by BambooHR at 28% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“TalentHR (Best overall for limited budgets)” Grok 4.1 Fast · HR compliance · budget prompt · first choice
“If you have a very small team (under 10 people) and want an incredibly easy setup: Start on TalentHR's free tier.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · HRIS and HCM platforms · budget prompt · alternative
“Free for up to 10 users (freemium) | Startups needing applicant tracking + basic HR” Grok 4.1 Fast · HRIS and HCM platforms · budget prompt · alternative
“starts at $2/user/month ... though it's more of an HR suite with ATS features” GPT-5.4 mini · Applicant tracking syste · budget prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 24 of the 32 answers that named TalentHR and are not a share of its labels.
Eighty of the eighty-nine domain citations in answers naming TalentHR came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when TalentHR's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as TalentHR, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at talenthr.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.