HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › The Org · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

The Org

17Judge labels

0First choices

6Negative labels

8 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

6 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. The Org was named 6 times in Org charts, where ChartHop led with 27%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business16 of 76

under the label threshold

Mid-market79 of 81

under the label threshold

Enterprise78 of 90

under the label threshold

In org charts · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named The Org for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Org charts and org design	Workforce planning and analytics	0%	79 of 81	67%	6	under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for The Org yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated The Org across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	2	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained5 labelsNone

Negative7 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The Org (free builder) | Simple upload of a CSV, nice templates, embeddable public link.” MiniMax M2.5 · Org charts · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid using public-facing platforms for your internal operational planning or sensitive personnel directories.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Org charts · negative prompt · hard negative

“Avoid if privacy is a priority... Users and privacy advocates call it a "hard no."” Grok 4.1 Fast · Org charts · negative prompt · hard negative

“public platforms like The Org for sensitive organizations” Kimi K2 · Org charts · negative prompt · hard negative

“Your org chart is public. If your company prefers to keep internal reporting structures... private, this is not the tool for you.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Org charts · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as The Org, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and The Org was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

ChartHop12 of 172Not in the top three

Lucidchart12 of 172Not in the top three

Organimi11 of 174Not in the top three

Pingboard9 of 171Not in the top three

Microsoft Visio7 of 170Not in the top three

OrgChart7 of 170Not in the top three

Creately6 of 170Not in the top three

BambooHR5 of 170Not in the top three

Canva5 of 170Not in the top three

Microsoft PowerPoint5 of 170Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named The Org. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 17 answers that named The Org and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

theorgchart.comYour site9

gartner.com7

forbes.com6

functionly.com6

orgchartstudio.com6

happeo.com5

peoplemanagingpeople.com5

capterra.com4

firsthr.app4

g2.com4

Forty-seven of the fifty-six domain citations in answers naming The Org came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/org-chart-software7

forbes.com/advisor/business/software/best-org-chart-software6

happeo.com/blog/org-chart-software5

orgchartstudio.com/blog/org-chart-software-comparison5

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-org-chart-tools5

theorgchart.com/resources/best-org-chart-software5

firsthr.app/compare/general/org-chart-software4

functionly.com/orginometry/organizational-accountability/the-ultimate-guide-to-choosing-th4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as The Org

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as The Org; a claim can dispute any of them.

The Org (theorg.com) 1The Org Chart 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when The Org's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as The Org, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at theorgchart.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.