HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › TheHireHub.AI · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

TheHireHub.AI

7Judge labels

2First choices

0Negative labels

6 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

6 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. TheHireHub.AI was named 6 times in AI recruiting assistants, where GoPerfect led with 19%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business54 of 70

under the label threshold

Mid-market7 of 84

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In ai recruiting assistants · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named TheHireHub.AI for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
AI recruiting assistants	Talent acquisition	5%	7 of 84	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by GoPerfect at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for TheHireHub.AI yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated TheHireHub.AI across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labels2

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“the best overall AI recruiter for a mid-market B2B company is TheHireHub.AI (AiRA)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · AI recruiting assistants · direct prompt · first choice

“Best overall for mid-market companies wanting end-to-end automation” MiniMax M2.5 · AI recruiting assistants · direct prompt · first choice

“Best for mid-market and teams in India/MEA wanting end-to-end automation.” Mistral Small · AI recruiting assistants · direct prompt · alternative

“Other options include Humanly, TheHireHub.AI, and Lever” Llama 4 Maverick · AI recruiting assistants · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as TheHireHub.AI, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and TheHireHub.AI was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Ashby6 of 71Not in the top three

Greenhouse4 of 71Not in the top three

Workable4 of 70Not in the top three

Autonomy Recruit3 of 71Not in the top three

Lever3 of 70Not in the top three

hireEZ2 of 70Not in the top three

Gem1 of 71Not in the top three

Breezy HR1 of 70Not in the top three

Fetcher1 of 70Not in the top three

Findem1 of 70Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named TheHireHub.AI. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 7 answers that named TheHireHub.AI and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

thehirehub.aiYour site7

greenhouse.com6

goperfect.com4

guideflow.com4

artisan.co3

autonomyrecruit.com3

hiretruffle.com2

pin.com2

resources.rework.com2

100hires.com1

Twenty-seven of the thirty-four domain citations in answers naming TheHireHub.AI came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

thehirehub.ai/guides/ai-recruiting-tools7

greenhouse.com/blog/best-ai-recruiting-software6

guideflow.com/blog/ai-recruiting-software4

artisan.co/blog/best-ai-recruiting-tools3

autonomyrecruit.com/blog/top-5-ai-recruiting-tools3

goperfect.com/blog/8-best-ai-talent-acquisition-software-for-mid-market-companies-in-20263

goperfect.com/blog/best-ai-recruitment-platforms-for-mid-sized-companies-in-20262

hiretruffle.com/blog/ai-recruiting-software2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as TheHireHub.AI

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as TheHireHub.AI; a claim can dispute any of them.

TheHireHub.AI (AiRA) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when TheHireHub.AI's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as TheHireHub.AI, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at thehirehub.ai is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.