HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Autonomy Recruit · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Autonomy Recruit

5Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

5 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Autonomy Recruit was named 4 times in AI recruiting assistants, where GoPerfect led with 19%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market13 of 84

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In ai recruiting assistants · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Autonomy Recruit for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
AI recruiting assistants	Talent acquisition	2%	13 of 84	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by GoPerfect at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Autonomy Recruit yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Autonomy Recruit across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labels1

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The best AI recruiter for a mid-market B2B company is Autonomy Recruit” Llama 4 Maverick · AI recruiting assistants · direct prompt · first choice

“Best for End-to-End Automation (The "Full Service" Option) Top Pick: Autonomy Recruit” Qwen 3.7 Flash · AI recruiting assistants · direct prompt · alternative

“Budget‑friendly flat‑rate option (~$99/mo) if you prioritize low cost” GLM 4.7 FlashX · AI recruiting assistants · direct prompt · alternative

“Autonomy Recruit is also positioned as a top mid-market option” Perplexity Sonar · AI recruiting assistants · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Autonomy Recruit, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Autonomy Recruit was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Greenhouse4 of 50Not in the top three

TheHireHub.AI3 of 51Not in the top three

Workable3 of 51Not in the top three

Ashby3 of 50Not in the top three

Lever2 of 51Not in the top three

Gem1 of 51Not in the top three

GoPerfect1 of 51Not in the top three

SmartRecruiters1 of 51Not in the top three

Humanly1 of 50Not in the top three

JobScore1 of 50Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Autonomy Recruit. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 5 answers that named Autonomy Recruit and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

autonomyrecruit.comYour site5

greenhouse.com4

thehirehub.ai4

goperfect.com3

guideflow.com3

herohunt.ai3

resources.rework.com3

artisan.co2

pin.com2

selectsoftwarereviews.com2

Twenty-six of the thirty-one domain citations in answers naming Autonomy Recruit came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

autonomyrecruit.com/blog/top-5-ai-recruiting-tools4

greenhouse.com/blog/best-ai-recruiting-software4

thehirehub.ai/guides/ai-recruiting-tools4

guideflow.com/blog/ai-recruiting-software3

artisan.co/blog/best-ai-recruiting-tools2

goperfect.com/blog/best-ai-recruitment-platforms-for-mid-sized-companies-in-20262

resources.rework.com/tools/ai-tools/best-ai-recruiting-tools-20262

100hires.com/amazinghiring-pricing.html1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Autonomy Recruit's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Autonomy Recruit, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at autonomyrecruit.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.