HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Treegarden · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Treegarden

3Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

3 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Treegarden was named 3 times in Applicant tracking syste and 1 other category, where Greenhouse led with 47%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market20 of 50

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In applicant tracking syste · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Treegarden for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Applicant tracking systems	Talent acquisition	0%	20 of 50	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Greenhouse at 47%
Internal talent marketplace	Performance and talent management	0%	69 of 129	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Fuel50 at 26%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Treegarden yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Treegarden across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Treegarden: Best value for growing mid-market companies, with a flat-rate pricing model” Llama 4 Maverick · Applicant tracking syste · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Disprz/Treegarden (mid-market)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Internal talent marketpl · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Treegarden, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Treegarden was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Greenhouse2 of 31Not in the top three

Lever2 of 31Not in the top three

Ashby2 of 30Not in the top three

Pinpoint2 of 30Not in the top three

Gloat1 of 31Not in the top three

Workable1 of 31Not in the top three

365Talents1 of 30Not in the top three

BambooHR1 of 30Not in the top three

Disprz1 of 30Not in the top three

Fuel501 of 30Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Treegarden. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 3 answers that named Treegarden and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

treegarden.ioYour site3

100hires.com2

hrstechspace.com2

365talents.com1

avature.net1

b2breviews.com1

deloitte.com1

disprz.ai1

gartner.com1

gloat.com1

Eleven of the fourteen domain citations in answers naming Treegarden came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

100hires.com/best-ats-for-mid-market-companies.html2

hrstechspace.com/talent-acquisition/best-ats-software-in-20262

treegarden.io/blog/best-ats-mid-market-companies-20262

365talents.com/en/resources/how-to-choose-internal-marketplace-solution1

avature.net/blogs/the-talent-marketplace-a-comprehensive-guide1

b2breviews.com/applicant-tracking-systems1

deloitte.com/us/en/insights/topics/talent/internal-talent-marketplace.html1

disprz.ai/blog/internal-talent-marketplace1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Treegarden's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Treegarden, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at treegarden.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.