HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Tyler Technologies · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Tyler Technologies

4Judge labels

0First choices

4Negative labels

4 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Tyler Technologies was named 2 times in HR compliance and 1 other category, where Rippling led with 16%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market82 of 84

under the label threshold

Enterprise71 of 72

under the label threshold

In hr compliance · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Tyler Technologies for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
HR compliance and policy management	Core HR and payroll	0%	82 of 84	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 16%
HR help desk and case management	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	91 of 93	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Zoho Desk at 26%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Tyler Technologies yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Tyler Technologies across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“2024 breach exposed SSNs and PII, resulting in class-action lawsuits for inadequate protection.” Grok 4.1 Fast · HR compliance · negative prompt · hard negative

“Tyler Technologies for public-sector HR (documented breach + settlement)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · HR help desk · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Tyler Technologies, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Tyler Technologies was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

UKG Pro3 of 40Not in the top three

Workday2 of 40Not in the top three

BambooHR1 of 41Not in the top three

ADP1 of 40Not in the top three

ChatGPT1 of 40Not in the top three

Eightfold AI1 of 40Not in the top three

First Advantage Form I-9 Compliance1 of 40Not in the top three

Gusto1 of 40Not in the top three

MOVEit Transfer1 of 40Not in the top three

Mitratech Mineral1 of 40Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Tyler Technologies. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named Tyler Technologies and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

blog.inovium.com4

guideflow.com3

hrfuture.net3

peoplemanagingpeople.com3

toolradar.com3

aviatrix.ai2

faceup.com2

kelleydrye.com2

linkedin.com2

outsolve.com2

Twenty-six of the twenty-six domain citations in answers naming Tyler Technologies came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

blog.inovium.com/blog/data-breaches-in-hr-software-deep-legal-lessons-from-tyler-technolog4

hrfuture.net/strategy-operations/hr-tech-digital-transformation/hr-data-security-risk-regi3

toolradar.com/guides/best-hr-compliance-software3

aviatrix.ai/threat-research-center/sickkids-data-breach-employee-job-applicant-info-20242

faceup.com/en/blog/hr-compliance-software2

guideflow.com/blog/hr-compliance-software2

kelleydrye.com/viewpoints/blogs/ad-law-access/new-ftc-data-breach-cases-focus-on-hr-servic2

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-compliance-software2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Tyler Technologies's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Tyler Technologies, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at tylertech.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.