HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Visme · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Visme

7Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

3 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Visme was named 4 times in Org charts, where ChartHop led with 27%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business30 of 76

under the label threshold

Mid-market13 of 81

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In org charts · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Visme for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Org charts and org design	Workforce planning and analytics	2%	13 of 81	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Visme yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Visme across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained4 labels1

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“is Organimi, Miro, Lucidchart, or Visme, as they offer affordable monthly fees” Llama 4 Maverick · Org charts · budget prompt · first choice

“For more affordable options, Organimi, Miro, Lucidchart, and Visme are worth considering” Llama 4 Maverick · Org charts · direct prompt · alternative

“they may not scale as effectively for very complex or large organizations” Mistral Small · Org charts · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Visme, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Visme was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Organimi7 of 71Not in the top three

Lucidchart7 of 70Not in the top three

Miro7 of 70Not in the top three

Canva3 of 71Not in the top three

Creately3 of 70Not in the top three

OneDirectory2 of 72Not in the top three

draw.io2 of 71Not in the top three

ChartHop1 of 70Not in the top three

Cogniver1 of 70Not in the top three

Microsoft Word1 of 70Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Visme. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 7 answers that named Visme and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

forbes.com7

fitsmallbusiness.com4

learn.g2.com4

cogniver.com3

creately.com3

gartner.com3

firsthr.app2

onedirectory.com2

peerdom.com2

worldmetrics.org2

Thirty-two of the thirty-two domain citations in answers naming Visme came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

forbes.com/advisor/business/software/best-org-chart-software7

fitsmallbusiness.com/best-org-chart-software4

learn.g2.com/best-org-chart-software4

cogniver.com/insights/best-org-chart-software-small-business3

creately.com/reviews/best-org-chart-software3

gartner.com/reviews/market/org-chart-software3

firsthr.app/compare/general/org-chart-software2

onedirectory.com/blog/best-org-chart-software2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Visme's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Visme, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at visme.co is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.