Every category where a model named Wizehire for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Recruitment marketing and career sites	Talent acquisition	0%	69 of 81	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Teamtailor at 16%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Wizehire yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Wizehire across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labels1

Paraphrase1 label1

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained4 labels1

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative12 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Wizehire, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Wizehire was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

100Hires8 of 123Not in the top three

Manatal7 of 124Not in the top three

JazzHR5 of 122Not in the top three

TalentLyft4 of 122Not in the top three

LinkedIn Talent Solutions4 of 120Not in the top three

Workable4 of 120Not in the top three

Greenhouse3 of 120Not in the top three

JuggleHire3 of 120Not in the top three

Zoho Recruit2 of 121Not in the top three

Beamery2 of 120Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Wizehire. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 12 answers that named Wizehire and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

getapp.com11

g2.com10

learn.g2.com10

selectsoftwarereviews.com10

recruitcompare.io9

hiretruffle.com4

joveo.com4

100hires.com3

jazzhr.com3

jugglehire.com3

Sixty-seven of the sixty-seven domain citations in answers naming Wizehire came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

getapp.com/all-software/recruitment-marketing-platforms/org/small-business11

learn.g2.com/best-recruitment-marketing-platforms10

selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/recruitment-marketing-software10

g2.com/categories/recruitment-marketing/small-business9

recruitcompare.io/best/best-recruitment-marketing-platforms9

joveo.com/blog/top-recruitment-marketing-platforms4

jugglehire.com/blog/recruitment-software/recruitment-marketing-software3

talentlyft.com/pricing3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Wizehire

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Wizehire; a claim can dispute any of them.

WizeHire 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Wizehire's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Wizehire, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at wizehire.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.