AI recruiting assistants for small business buyers
Asked as “AI recruiter”, and as “AI-powered candidate screening tool”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 51 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
29%
Contested · Zoho Recruit 18%
29Manatal18Zoho Recruit14Workable39others
29% of first choices, contested.
Since September 2026▼−1Since September 2026: 25% → 24%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Manatal held the lead, −1 point on 25%, inside the 13-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Manatal29%Contested▼−1Since September 2026: 25% → 24%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageMid-marketManatal31%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Manatal (33%) replaces GoPerfect (19% then, 2% now), 31 points clear, past the 13-point floor.Standing →Enterprise
Eightfold AI44%Clear leader▲+12Since September 2026: 32% → 45%, +12 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →
Manatal29%Contested▼−1Since September 2026: 25% → 24%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageMid-marketManatal31%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Manatal (33%) replaces GoPerfect (19% then, 2% now), 31 points clear, past the 13-point floor.Standing →EnterpriseEightfold AI44%Clear leader▲+12Since September 2026: 32% → 45%, +12 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Manatal29%0%40accepted challenger▼−1Since September 2026: 25% → 24%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.25% → 24%
Manatal29%0%40accepted challenger▼−1Since September 2026: 25% → 24%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.25% → 24%02
Zoho Recruit18%0%30accepted challenger▲+18Since September 2026: 2% → 20%, +18 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 20%
Zoho Recruit18%0%30accepted challenger▲+18Since September 2026: 2% → 20%, +18 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 20%03
Workable14%3%38accepted challenger▼−1Since September 2026: 12% → 11%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.12% → 11%
Workable14%3%38accepted challenger▼−1Since September 2026: 12% → 11%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.12% → 11%04
Breezy HR4%0%18accepted challenger▼−3Since September 2026: 8% → 4%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.8% → 4%
Breezy HR4%0%18accepted challenger▼−3Since September 2026: 8% → 4%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.8% → 4%05
Pin2%0%16accepted challenger▼−20Since September 2026: 22% → 2%, −20 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.22% → 2%
Pin2%0%16accepted challenger▼−20Since September 2026: 22% → 2%, −20 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.22% → 2%Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
09Eightfold AI0%77%13criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Eightfold AI0%77%13criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%08
HireVue0%73%15criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
HireVue0%73%15criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%07
hireEZ0%50%10criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
hireEZ0%50%10criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%06
Juicebox0%14%14accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%
Juicebox0%14%14accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Manatal vs GemManatal vs HumanlyManatal vs AshbyManatal vs JuiceboxWorkable vs GreenhouseWorkable vs Zoho RecruitWorkable vs GemWorkable vs HumanlyWorkable vs AshbyWorkable vs JuiceboxGreenhouse vs Zoho RecruitGreenhouse vs GemGreenhouse vs HumanlyGreenhouse vs AshbyGreenhouse vs JuiceboxZoho Recruit vs GemZoho Recruit vs HumanlyZoho Recruit vs AshbyZoho Recruit vs JuiceboxGem vs HumanlyGem vs AshbyGem vs JuiceboxHumanly vs AshbyHumanly vs JuiceboxAshby vs Juicebox
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
010203040506070809Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Manatal29%
Manatal29%02Zoho Recruit18%
Zoho Recruit18%03Workable14%
Workable14%04Breezy HR4%
Breezy HR4%05Pin2%
Pin2%06Juicebox0%
Juicebox0%07hireEZ0%
hireEZ0%08HireVue0%
HireVue0%09Eightfold AI0%
Eightfold AI0%What they warned about
Zero of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Eightfold AI77%
10 of 13 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“Many dominant AI recruiting tools (like Eightfold, HiredScore, or enterprise tiers of Greenhouse) are built for companies with dedicated IT departments and six-figure budgets.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, scale prompt
HireVue73%
11 of 15 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Tools That Rely on Facial or Voice Analysis (e.g., HireVue-style Video Assessment Tools) **Avoid these. Full stop.**” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
Greenhouse56%
5 of 9 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“enterprise tiers of Greenhouse) are built for companies with dedicated IT departments and six-figure budgets” Gemini 3.5 Flash, scale prompt
hireEZ50%
5 of 10 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid "Enterprise Bloat": Platforms like Eightfold or HireEZ ... built for massive corporations” Gemini 3.5 Flash, paraphrase prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
77 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1045 links across 262 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 2 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Pin38 answers · 59 citations · 11 models
34 answers · 51 citations · 11 models
vendor site · HeroHunt.ai27 answers · 41 citations · 10 models
25 answers · 30 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Lever24 answers · 26 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Juicebox22 answers · 26 citations · 11 models
20 answers · 26 citations · 8 models
18 answers · 18 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Zapier18 answers · 18 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Greenhouse15 answers · 20 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Paychex15 answers · 16 citations · 10 models
14 answers · 15 citations · 6 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
29 answers · 10 models
24 answers · 11 models
19 answers · 8 models
17 answers · 8 models
17 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 9 models
15 answers · 10 models
14 answers · 7 models
14 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “ai recruiter”, “ai recruiting tools”, “best ai recruiter”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manatal manatal.com | 29% | 294 | 2,400 | 267 | 73,150 | 120 | ||
| Zoho zoho.com Zoho Recruit 18% | 18% | 322 | 2,900 | 46 | 1,216,894 company | $51,031 | 119 | |
| Workable workable.com | 14% | 308 | 14,800 | 520 | 698,499 | $14,562 | 77 | |
| Hirevire hirevire.com | 6% | 65 | 210 | 0 | 444 | 0 | ||
| Breezy breezy.hr Breezy HR 4% | 4% | 189 | 3,600 | 59 | 178,670 company | $56 | 25 | |
| AvaHR avahr.com | 4% | 16 | ||||||
| Talsense talsense.com | 4% | 2 | ||||||
| Pin pin.com | 2% | 199 | 368,000 | 243,385 | 24,375 | 28 | ||
| Metaview metaview.ai | 2% | 66 | 9,900 | 49 | 39,923 | $9,200 | 55 | 7 |
| GoPerfect goperfect.com | 2% | 14 | 390 | 2 | 7,666 | 0 | 4 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (hiretruffle.com, peoplemanagingpeople.com, selectsoftwarereviews.com, zapier.com). The first result for “ai recruiter” is reddit.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best AI recruiter for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which AI-powered candidate screening tool would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top AI recruiting tools for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best AI recruiter for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating an AI recruiter. What should we look at?”Negative“Which AI recruiting tools should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceWorkableChangedJuicebox, ManatalManatal, Zoho Recruitno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Breezy HR, GoPerfect, JazzHR, ManatalThree alternatives
Fetcher, Truffle, Zoho RecruitThree alternatives
HiredAI, JazzHR, PinGPT-5.4 miniRecruiterflow, WorkableZoho RecruitChangedLever, WorkableTalentHR, Zoho Recruitagainst: Braintrust AIRno first choicenothing named
One alternative
Zoho RecruitOne alternative
HireVue AI InterviewerThirteen alternatives
100Hires, AvaHR, Breezy HR, Gem, Greenhouse, HireVue, Humanly, Juicebox, Manatal, Paradox, SeekOut, Zoho Recruit, hireEZOne alternative
100HiresGemini 3.5 FlashPeopleGPT, PinTalsenseChangedagainst: Eightfold AI, LinkedIn Recruiter, hireEZJuicebox, Manatal, Metaview, TruffleHiredAI, Manatal, Talsenseagainst: LinkedIn Recruiterno first choiceagainst: Eightfold AI, Greenhouse, HiredScoreagainst: ChatGPT, Eightfold AI, Workday Recruiting
Four alternatives
HiredAI, Manatal, Metaview, WorkableThree alternatives
GoPerfect, HiredAI, WorkableTwo alternatives
Workable, hireEZFour alternatives
Breezy HR, Juicebox, Truffle, Zoho RecruitSeven alternatives
Humanly, Juicebox, Manatal, Metaview, PeopleGPT, Tenzo AI, WorkablePerplexity SonarWorkableManatalChangedManatalZoho Recruitagainst: Truffleno first choicenothing named
Five alternatives
Fetcher Self-Serve, Manatal, Metaview, Pin, SeekOut Recruit CoreTwo alternatives
HireBeat, WorkableEight alternatives
Breezy HR, Fetcher, Juicebox, Metaview, Recruiterflow, TestGorilla, Vervoe, WorkableTwo alternatives
Manatal, PinGrok 4.1 FastManatalTurboHireChangedManatalZoho Recruitno first choiceagainst: Eightfold AI, HireVue, Workday AI hiring features
Three alternatives
AvaHR, Workable, Zoho RecruitTwo alternatives
Truffle, WorkableFour alternatives
Breezy HR, Pin, Workable, Zoho RecruitOne alternative
ManatalFour alternatives
CloudTalk, Monday.com, Pin, WorkableMistral SmallFetcher Self-Serve, Metaviewagainst: LinkedIn RecruiterHirevireChangedHeroHunt.ai, PinManatal, Zoho Recruitno first choicenothing named
One alternative
SeekOut Recruit CoreTwo alternatives
Eightfold AI, TruffleFive alternatives
Breezy HR, HireVue, Juicebox, Manatal, WorkableThree alternatives
GoPerfect, Juicebox, WeekdayDeepSeek V4 FlashAvaHRagainst: Eightfold AI, Greenhouse, Lever, SeekOutHirevireChangedagainst: HireVuePinManatalno first choiceagainst: HireVue
Three alternatives
LinkedIn Recruiter, Workable, Zoho RecruitFour alternatives
Manatal, Skima AI, Truffle, WorkableFour alternatives
Breezy HR, Manatal, Workable, Zoho RecruitThree alternatives
Metaview, Qureos, Zoho RecruitLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceGoPerfectChangedno first choiceManatalno first choiceagainst: LinkedIn Recruiter, SeekOut, hireEZ
Two alternatives
Ace Your Interviews, Eightfold AIThree alternatives
Pin, Rework, Zoho RecruitQwen 3.7 FlashGemHirevireChangedBreezy HR, Paradoxagainst: hireEZBreezy HRagainst: Eightfold AI, Gloat, Pymetricsno first choiceagainst: Ashby, Eightfold AI, Employ, Greenhouse, HireVue, Lever, Workday Recruiting
Four alternatives
Ashby, HubSpot Recruitment, SeekOut, Zoho RecruitOne alternative
Eightfold AIThree alternatives
Greenhouse, Humanly, LemonfyrThree alternatives
Sorcero, TealHQ, Zoho RecruitKimi K2Zoho RecruitAvaHRChangedBreezy HR, Manatal, Workableagainst: GreenhouseManatalno first choiceagainst: HireVue, Pymetrics, Workday AI Hiring Tools
Four alternatives
Fetcher, Manatal, Paradox, TruffleTwo alternatives
Breezy HR, WorkableTwo alternatives
Lever, TeamtailorThree alternatives
Breezy HR, Pin, Zoho RecruitGLM 4.7 FlashXManatalagainst: ParadoxInterviewFlowAI, WorkableChangedManatal, Workableagainst: Eightfold AI, HireVue, Juicebox, ParadoxManatal, Zoho Recruitno first choiceagainst: Amazon, HireVue, LinkedIn Recruiter, SeekOut, hireEZ
Two alternatives
Monday.com, WorkableOne alternative
ManatalTwo alternatives
Jill AI, Zoho RecruitThree alternatives
Pin, Zapier, monday.com AgentsMiniMax M2.5WorkableManatalChangedPinagainst: Eightfold AIBreezy HR, Zoho Recruitno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
HeroHunt.ai, HireBasisOne alternative
PinFive alternatives
Manatal, Paradox, SeekOut, Workable, Zoho RecruitGPT-6 LunaWorkableManatalChangedManatal, WorkableManatalagainst: Sherpano first choiceagainst: HireVue, Workday's AI screening features, including HiredScore
Two alternatives
Ashby, ManatalOne alternative
WorkableThree alternatives
Ashby, Juicebox, Zoho RecruitOne alternative
Breezy HRMuse Glimmer 30BWorkableManatalChangedagainst: HireVue, ParadoxJuicebox, Manatalagainst: Eightfold AI, Gem, GoodTime, Greenhouse, HireVue, Humanly, Lever, Paradox, TeamtailorManatalno first choiceagainst: Ashby, Fetcher, Findem, Gem, HireVue, Juicebox, SeekOut, Workable, hireEZ
Five alternatives
Humanly, Manatal, Peoplebox.ai, Zoho Recruit, hireEZTwo alternatives
Breezy HR, GoPerfectFive alternatives
Hirevire, Metaview, Pin, Workable, Zoho RecruitOne alternative
Zoho RecruitBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:17 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:07 | yes | 4 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:09 | yes | 31 | 30 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:04 | yes | 20 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:07 | yes | 23 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:49 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:50 | yes | 23 | 51 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:38 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:29 | no | 0 | 32 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:58 | yes | 10 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 07:50 | yes | 20 | 65 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:14 | yes | 5 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:42 | yes | 4 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:04 | yes | 13 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:54 | yes | 16 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:45 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:13 | yes | 12 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:44 | yes | 20 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:10 | yes | 25 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:21 | yes | 14 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:24 | yes | 24 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:25 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:54 | yes | 15 | 31 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:08 | yes | 20 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:23 | yes | 22 | 397 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:40 | yes | 5 | 49 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:02 | yes | 3 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:03 | yes | 15 | 27 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:59 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:53 | yes | 3 | 12 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:58 | yes | 14 | 28 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:56 | yes | 20 | 4 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:02 | yes | 20 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:13 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:02 | yes | 23 | 35 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:51 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 12:02 | yes | 15 | 37 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:12 | yes | 15 | 30 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:26 | yes | 24 | 191 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:07 | yes | 5 | 13 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:07 | yes | 5 | 42 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:06 | yes | 14 | 34 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 12:03 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:01 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:53 | yes | 10 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:23 | yes | 20 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:33 | yes | 23 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:06 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:39 | yes | 24 | 17 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:19 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:14 | no | 0 | 35 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 12:04 | yes | 14 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:36 | yes | 25 | 108 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:13 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:57 | yes | 3 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:25 | yes | 15 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:46 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:36 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:24 | yes | 12 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:06 | yes | 19 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:44 | yes | 15 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:14 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:27 | yes | 24 | 38 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:04 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 07:52 | no | 0 | 34 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:10 | yes | 20 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:42 | yes | 15 | 50 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:01 | yes | 5 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:42 | yes | 3 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:00 | yes | 13 | 42 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:25 | yes | 19 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:25 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:31 | yes | 16 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:35 | yes | 20 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:24 | yes | 22 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:39 | yes | 13 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:22 | yes | 23 | 40 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:39 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 12:07 | yes | 15 | 43 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:14 | yes | 25 | 39 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:31 | yes | 23 | 30 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:17 | yes | 10 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:47 | yes | 3 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:05 | yes | 12 | 29 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Eightfold read as Eightfold AI
Workday read as Workday Recruiting
Unresolved, counted raw
Ace Your Interviews
Apploi
HireBeat
HireVue AI Interviewer
HubSpot Recruitment (via App Marketplace)
Impress AI
Jill AI (Jack & Jill)
Lemonfyr
Rebecca AI (Pete & Gabi)
Second Talent
Sherpa
Sorcero
TealHQ
Tenzo AI
The Hire Hub
Workday AI Hiring Tools
Workday AI hiring features
Workday's AI screening features, including HiredScore
Zoom AI
monday.com Agents
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.