HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › ADP Time & Attendance · September 2026 Edition

ADP · 1 category · Named, not ranked

ADP Time & Attendance

7Judge labels

0First choices

6Negative labels

5 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. ADP Time & Attendance was named 2 times in Time and attendance, where UKG Ready led with 15%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business68 of 73

under the label threshold

Mid-market87 of 90

under the label threshold

Enterprise87 of 104

under the label threshold

In time and attendance · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named ADP Time & Attendance for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Time and attendance	Core HR and payroll	0%	87 of 90	100%	2	under 10 labels · led by UKG Ready at 15%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ADP Time & Attendance yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ADP Time & Attendance across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative6 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Common complaints: Configuration complexity leading to punch errors, accrual miscalculations, rounding rule problems” Kimi K2 · Time and attendance · negative prompt · soft negative

“Administrators report recurring connectivity issues with ADP-hosted clocks” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Time and attendance · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ADP Time & Attendance, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ADP Time & Attendance was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

QuickBooks Time2 of 71Not in the top three

UKG Pro2 of 71Not in the top three

Buddy Punch1 of 71Not in the top three

Connecteam1 of 71Not in the top three

Deputy1 of 71Not in the top three

OnTheClock1 of 71Not in the top three

Dayforce1 of 70Not in the top three

Eddy1 of 70Not in the top three

Gusto1 of 70Not in the top three

Harvest1 of 70Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ADP Time & Attendance. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 7 answers that named ADP Time & Attendance and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gartner.com6

bigideasdb.com4

g2.com4

opentimeclock.com4

reddit.com4

selectsoftwarereviews.com4

business.com3

capterra.com3

forbes.com3

learn.g2.com3

Thirty-eight of the thirty-eight domain citations in answers naming ADP Time & Attendance came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/time-and-attendance-software6

bigideasdb.com/software/time-attendance4

opentimeclock.com/blog2026/common-adp-time-attendance-problems.html4

selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/time-and-attendance-software4

business.com/categories/time-and-attendance-software3

forbes.com/advisor/business/software/best-time-attendance-software3

yjolt.org/when-timekeeping-software-undermines-compliance3

associatedtimeondemand.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Wage-and-Hour-Lawsuits.pdf2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as ADP Time & Attendance

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as ADP Time & Attendance; a claim can dispute any of them.

ADP Time & Attendance (Workforce Now / TimeSaver) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ADP Time & Attendance's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ADP Time & Attendance, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at adp.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.