Every category where a model named OnTheClock for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Time and attendance	Core HR and payroll	0%	23 of 90	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by UKG Ready at 15%
Leave and absence management	Core HR and payroll	0%	64 of 89	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by BambooHR at 28%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for OnTheClock yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated OnTheClock across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative5 labelsNone

Budget-constrained6 labelsNone

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative2 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative19 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“A highly reliable, no-nonsense time clock designed for distributed field crews.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Time and attendance · budget prompt · alternative

“Field/remote/deskless crews \u2192 Connecteam, OnTheClock” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Time and attendance · comparative prompt · alternative

“OnTheClock is best for distributed field crews” Llama 4 Maverick · Time and attendance · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as OnTheClock, over the 19 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and OnTheClock was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Connecteam15 of 191Not in the top three

Homebase12 of 193Not in the top three

QuickBooks Time10 of 191Not in the top three

Deputy9 of 193Not in the top three

Buddy Punch7 of 190Not in the top three

Clockify6 of 192Not in the top three

When I Work6 of 190Not in the top three

Jibble5 of 192Not in the top three

TimeClock Plus4 of 190Not in the top three

Insightful3 of 190Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named OnTheClock. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 18 of the 19 answers that named OnTheClock and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

forbes.com10

techrepublic.com9

gartner.com7

selectsoftwarereviews.com7

timetrex.com6

business.com5

uschamber.com5

buddypunch.com4

capterra.com4

connecteam.com4

Sixty-one of the sixty-one domain citations in answers naming OnTheClock came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

techrepublic.com/article/best-time-and-attendance-software9

forbes.com/advisor/business/software/best-time-attendance-software7

gartner.com/reviews/market/time-and-attendance-software7

selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/time-and-attendance-software7

business.com/categories/time-and-attendance-software5

timetrex.com/blog/best-time-and-attendance-software-20245

uschamber.com/co/run/human-resources/time-and-attendance-software5

trackingtime.co/time-attendance-software/best-time-attendance-software.html4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when OnTheClock's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as OnTheClock, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at ontheclock.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.