Every category where a model named Bonterra for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Employee giving and volunteering	Onboarding and employee experience	2%	21 of 70	57%	7	under 10 labels · led by Millie at 22%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Bonterra yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Bonterra across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	1	1
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labels1

Paraphrase5 labelsNone

Comparative8 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labels1

Scale-constrained5 labelsNone

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative30 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“the best employee giving + volunteering platform is usually Bonterra (Deed / CSR platform)” GPT-5.4 mini · Giving & volunteering · direct prompt · first choice

“Best for: Mid-to-large companies wanting unified employee engagement and grantmaking” Kimi K2 · Giving & volunteering · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“you will want to avoid legacy enterprise systems like Benevity, Bonterra, or YourCause” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Giving & volunteering · budget prompt · hard negative

“Bonterra provides a consolidated admin view and robust grant management, yet suffers from tech debt and higher costs” Muse Glimmer 30B · Giving & volunteering · comparative prompt · soft negative

“you likely do not need Benevity or Bonterra unless you plan to scale to 2,000+ employees” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Giving & volunteering · scale prompt · soft negative

“Bonterra/CyberGrants — check exactly what you’re buying.” GPT-6 Luna · Giving & volunteering · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Bonterra, over the 30 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Bonterra was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Benevity Enterprise Impact Platform27 of 3015Not among the top eight

Groundswell16 of 301Not among the top eight

YourCause14 of 302Not among the top eight

Deed10 of 300Not among the top eight

Millie9 of 302Not among the top eight

Goodera9 of 301Not among the top eight

Selflessly6 of 303Not among the top eight

YourCause from Blackbaud6 of 302Not among the top eight

Submittable5 of 301Not among the top eight

Uncommon Giving5 of 301Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Bonterra. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 30 of the 30 answers that named Bonterra and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

benevity.com20

bonterratech.comYour site20

yourcause.com18

g2.com16

uncommongiving.com16

goodera.com15

guideflow.com15

groundswell.io9

us.fitgap.com8

intervue.io7

124 of the 144 domain citations in answers naming Bonterra came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

uncommongiving.com/uncommon-blog/csr-software11

guideflow.com/blog/csr-software10

bonterratech.com/blog/corporate-giving-platforms9

goodera.com/en-gb/blog/corporate-volunteering-software9

yourcause.com/articles/best-corporate-volunteering-software8

benevity.com/blog/best-employee-engagement-software7

benevity.com/blog/best-grant-management-software7

bonterratech.com/blog/charitable-giving-software7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

bonterratech.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Bonterra takes 2% of first choices and Millie takes 22%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “employee giving and volunteering platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “employee giving and volunteering platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 9,900 a month (“bonterra”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 706 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 79,840 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 10,316 · 897 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 24,531
Paid Google search: 2 searches its ads show for, about 16 clicks and $239 a month (estimate)

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

120+ ads · 79 text, 24 video, 17 image · 120 shown in the last 30 days

First shown May 2024, as Bonterra LLC, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 62 in the year, 58 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 21 of 70 in giving & volunteering

Segment leader

22%

Millie

First choices: 2 across its categories
Named in: 30 answers
Its own site cited: in 30 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on bonterratech.com

4,075

subdomains included

Content

1,623

counted in the table below

Documentation

2,213

Product · Integration

42 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	1,035	26	2026-09-28	Succession planning
Webinar or virtual event	248	9	2026-10-01
Case study	198	6	2026-09-28
Glossary or explainer	46	1	2026-07-14
News or press	41	5	2026-09-25
Template or tool	24	5	2026-08-14
Comparison	17	2	2026-09-24
Conference or event	7	5	2026-07-15
Podcast or video	4	0	2024-12-01
Report or ebook	3	0	2025-01-21

Most recent

2026-10-01Season of giving csr track webinar or virtual event
2026-10-01Season of giving fe track webinar or virtual event
2026-09-28What csr leaders get wrong when evaluating csr platforms blog
2026-09-28Participation gap why csr programs fall short what top programs do blog
2026-09-28Austin community court improves case management with apricot case study
2026-09-28The participation plateau blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page bonterratech.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Bonterra

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Bonterra; a claim can dispute any of them.

Bonterra (Deed / CSR platform) 1Bonterra (Deed) 1Bonterra (YourCause/CyberGrants) 1Bonterra (formerly CyberGrants + Deed) 1

Follow Bonterra

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Bonterra is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: The most-trusted nonprofit software for fundraising, grantmaking, case management and CSR.
bonterratech.com
For: Built for nonprofits, foundations, corporations and the public sector.
bonterratech.com
Price stated: customized pricing bonterratech.com/pricing/case-management
Free plan or trial: Free AI-powered tools, insights, and resources for every nonprofit. bonterratech.com
Customers named: Arab-American Family Support CenterAudubon SocietyMt. Caramel Veterans Service CenterSanofio9 SolutionsRippleInstacartKyndryl
Not stated on the pages read: Starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting

What Bonterra's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: bonterratech.com, bonterratech.com/pricing/case-management, bonterratech.com/product/deed, bonterratech.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Bonterra's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Bonterra, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Bonterra by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Bonterra is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Bonterra, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.