Every category where a model named Submittable for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Employee giving and volunteering	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	26 of 70	17%	6	under 10 labels · led by Millie at 22%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Submittable yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Submittable across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labels1

Paraphrase8 labels1

Comparative6 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative8 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative27 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Strong for grant application workflows, but less focused on employee engagement” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Giving & volunteering · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Submittable connects employees to 450,000 individual volunteer opportunities” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Giving & volunteering · comparative prompt · alternative

“Look at Submittable if you also need grant management capabilities” Kimi K2 · Giving & volunteering · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Grant management & workflows | High in CSR lists” Grok 4.1 Fast · Giving & volunteering · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“its volunteering component is not as mature as other platforms” Mistral Small · Giving & volunteering · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Submittable, over the 27 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Submittable was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Benevity Enterprise Impact Platform21 of 278Not among the top eight

Groundswell13 of 270Not among the top eight

Millie12 of 272Not among the top eight

Selflessly10 of 272Not among the top eight

Goodera7 of 270Not among the top eight

YourCause7 of 270Not among the top eight

Uncommon Giving6 of 274Not among the top eight

Chezuba6 of 270Not among the top eight

Deed6 of 270Not among the top eight

YourCause from Blackbaud5 of 272Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Submittable. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 27 of the 27 answers that named Submittable and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

bonterratech.com16

uncommongiving.com16

g2.com15

yourcause.com15

benevity.com13

submittable.comYour site13

goodera.com11

guideflow.com11

momogood.com9

worldmetrics.org9

115 of the 128 domain citations in answers naming Submittable came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

uncommongiving.com/uncommon-blog/csr-software11

bonterratech.com/blog/corporate-giving-platforms10

guideflow.com/blog/corporate-volunteering-software9

submittable.com/blog/best-csr-software9

yourcause.com/articles/best-corporate-volunteering-software9

momogood.com/blog/best-employee-giving-platforms8

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-csr-software8

blog.betterimpact.com/en/best-csr-software7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

submittable.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Submittable takes 0% of first choices and Millie takes 22%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “employee giving and volunteering platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “employee giving and volunteering platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 60,500 a month (“submittable”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 1,201 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 163,276 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 21,077 · 2,885 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 23,110
Paid Google search: 1 searches its ads show for, about 15 clicks and $162 a month (estimate)

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

60 ads · 33 video, 27 text · 33 shown in the last 30 days

First shown November 2024, as Submittable Holdings, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 12 in the year, 48 before. 17 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 26 of 70 in giving & volunteering

Segment leader

22%

Millie

First choices: 2 across its categories
Named in: 27 answers
Its own site cited: in 27 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on submittable.com

660

subdomains included

Content

428

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

45 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest
Blog	238	81	2026-09-20
Case study	83	2	2026-09-17
Webinar or virtual event	41	undated
Report or ebook	34	0	2026-03-03
Comparison	18	5	2026-09-20
Podcast or video	6	0	2026-05-14
Conference or event	3	1	2026-09-20
News or press	3	undated
Glossary or explainer	2	2	2026-09-20

Most recent

2026-09-202026 trends in grant management software blog
2026-09-209 ways data science blog
2026-09-20A new employee giving experience blog
2026-09-20Accessible submission forms blog
2026-09-20Ai for nonprofits blog
2026-09-20Ai tools for nonprofits blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page submittable.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Submittable

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Submittable is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Giving and granting software that never makes you compromise
submittable.com
For: foundations, governments, and corporations
submittable.com
Price stated: Pricing submittable.com/customer-stories
Certifications: SOC 2 Type IICCPAGDPRHIPAA
Hosting: US
Customers named: MGCC (Massachusetts Growth Capital Corporation)HubSpotStoneXUSDAJack In The Box FoundationState of MontanaLindsey Vonn Foundationthe Honnold Foundation
Not stated on the pages read: Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations

What Submittable's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: submittable.com, submittable.com/pricing, trust.submittable.com, submittable.com/solutions/grants, submittable.com/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Submittable's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Submittable, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Submittable by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Submittable is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Submittable, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.