5 categories · RankedClearCompany
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Employee onboarding | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 24 of 104 | 20% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by BambooHR at 29% |
| Performance management | Performance and talent management | 0% | 21 of 60 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 41% |
| Succession planning | Performance and talent management | 0% | 34 of 99 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 31% |
| 360 feedback | Performance and talent management | 0% | 29 of 77 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 40% |
| Skills intelligence | Performance and talent management | 0% | 52 of 162 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by TalentGuard at 19% |
Movement
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“You already use a separate payroll/benefits provider and just need strong onboarding | ClearCompany or TriNet” MiniMax M2.5 · Employee onboarding · direct prompt · alternative
“If you need succession as part of a broader HRIS/payroll ecosystem → Paylocity or ClearCompany” Kimi K2 · Succession planning · direct prompt · alternative
“Want one suite for hiring + performance + mobility: ClearCompany or similar bundled talent suites.” GPT-5.4 mini · Succession planning · comparative prompt · alternative
“ClearCompany | Mid‑market, HRIS + performance | Good HRIS integration, customizable workflows” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Performance management · scale prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Cons: Larger enterprise focus; can be complex to implement.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Employee onboarding · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 19 of the 22 answers that named ClearCompany and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
Fifty-one of the fifty-one domain citations in answers naming ClearCompany came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ClearCompany's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ClearCompany, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at clearcompany.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.