HR AI Index
Index › Vendors › EducateMe · September 2026 Edition
2 categories · Named, not ranked

EducateMe

3Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
2 of 12Models named it
2Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. EducateMe was named 3 times in Learning management syst and 1 other category, where TalentLMS led with 48%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market21 of 74
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In learning management syst · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named EducateMe for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Learning management systemsLearning and development0%21 of 740%2under 10 labels · led by TalentLMS at 48%
Online course librariesLearning and development0%52 of 730%1under 10 labels · led by Udemy Business at 32%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for EducateMe yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated EducateMe across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick01102
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Other affordable options include EducateMe, ProProfs Training Maker, and LearnWorlds.” Llama 4 Maverick · Learning management syst · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as EducateMe, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and EducateMe was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
TalentLMS3 of 32Not in the top three
Absorb LMS2 of 30Not in the top three
LinkedIn Learning1 of 31Not in the top three
Acorn1 of 30Not in the top three
CYPHER Learning1 of 30Not in the top three
Coursera for Business1 of 30Not in the top three
Deel HR1 of 30Not in the top three
Docebo1 of 30Not in the top three
Factorial1 of 30Not in the top three
GoodHabitz1 of 30Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named EducateMe. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 3 answers that named EducateMe and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

goskills.com3
educate-me.coYour site2
proprofstraining.com2
cypherlearning.com1
d2l.com1
docebo.com1
forbes.com1
goodhabitz.com1
learnworlds.com1
linkedin.com1

Twelve of the fourteen domain citations in answers naming EducateMe came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

goskills.com/resources/best-lms-compared2
cypherlearning.com/blog/business/top-lms-platforms-for-mid-size-companies-streamline-staff1
d2l.com/blog/lms-for-employee-training1
docebo.com/learning-network/blog/corporate-learning-management-systems1
docebo.com/learning-network/blog/lms-content-library1
educate-me.co/blog/affordable-lms1
educate-me.co/blog/enterprise-lms1
forbes.com/advisor/business/the-best-learning-management-systems1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as EducateMe

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as EducateMe; a claim can dispute any of them.
EducateMe LMS 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when EducateMe's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as EducateMe, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at educate-me.co is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack