Alternatives to EthicsPoint, as AI models named them
In the October 2026 Edition, 239 of the 252 answers collected in the one category where EthicsPoint holds a standing named it neither as a first choice nor as an alternative. These are the products those answers put first, category by category and buyer by buyer. The output is the models' output.
Whistleblowing and investigations
Eighty-one of the eighty-four answers did not name EthicsPoint; it was the first choice in one. The first choices in those eighty-one answers, twenty-four products in all, the eight most named:
Eighty of the eighty-four answers did not name EthicsPoint; it was the first choice in three. The first choices in those eighty answers, twenty-two products in all, the eight most named:
Seventy-eight of the eighty-four answers did not name EthicsPoint; it was the first choice in six. The first choices in those seventy-eight answers, twenty-one products in all, the eight most named:
How to read this
A category is asked six ways of each of fourteen models on behalf of each buyer segment, so a segment is eighty-four answers. An answer belongs on this page when the judge labeled EthicsPoint neither its first choice nor an alternative in it; the products listed are the first choices those answers made, counted once per answer. An answer that named nothing first, or named EthicsPoint only in passing, is in the denominator and adds to no product. The counts are not the category standing, which is on the category page with its share and rank; they are the same record read from EthicsPoint's side.
Every answer and every label behind these figures is in the record, sent on request. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index, and a product named instead of EthicsPoint was named by a model, not endorsed by anyone.