HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Express Evaluations · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Express Evaluations

13Judge labels

4First choices

0Negative labels

6 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Express Evaluations was named 4 times in 360 feedback, where Lattice led with 40%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business7 of 52

under the label threshold

Mid-market11 of 77

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In 360 feedback · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Express Evaluations for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
360 feedback	Performance and talent management	2%	11 of 77	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 40%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Express Evaluations yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Express Evaluations across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	1	0	1	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 label1

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative6 labelsNone

Budget-constrained5 labels3

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Express Evaluations and SurveyMonkey stand out as the best options for companies with limited budgets” Mistral Small · 360 feedback · budget prompt · first choice

“$2.25-2.50/user/month (annual min. ~$2K) | Simple performance mgmt” Grok 4.1 Fast · 360 feedback · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Express Evaluations, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Express Evaluations was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

PerformYard8 of 130Not in the top three

Spidergap7 of 132Not in the top three

SurveyMonkey7 of 130Not in the top three

Small Improvements6 of 131Not in the top three

FeedbackPulse5 of 133Not in the top three

ThriveSparrow5 of 130Not in the top three

Effy AI4 of 131Not in the top three

Primalogik4 of 130Not in the top three

SurveySparrow4 of 130Not in the top three

15Five3 of 130Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Express Evaluations. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 13 answers that named Express Evaluations and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

peoplemanagingpeople.com13

feedbackpulse.com9

nanoglobals.com9

betterworks.com7

workhuman.com7

business.com6

eletive.com4

firsthr.app4

effy.ai3

expressevaluations.comYour site3

Sixty-two of the sixty-five domain citations in answers naming Express Evaluations came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-360-degree-feedback-software13

nanoglobals.com/recommended/360-degree-feedback-tools9

betterworks.com/magazine/best-360-degree-feedback-tools7

feedbackpulse.com/resources/360-feedback-tools7

workhuman.com/blog/best-360-degree-feedback-software-tools7

business.com/articles/360-feedback-tools6

eletive.com/blog/360-feedback-tools4

feedbackpulse.com/resources/best-360-review-software4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Express Evaluations's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Express Evaluations, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at expressevaluations.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.