Every category where a model named Primalogik for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
360 feedback	Performance and talent management	10%	3 of 77	5%	20	accepted challenger
Performance management	Performance and talent management	0%	33 of 60	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 41%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Primalogik yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Primalogik across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1	0	2
Mistral Small	1	0	1	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	2	1	4
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	3	0	4
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	1	0	2
Kimi K2	0	2	0	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct10 labels2

Paraphrase12 labels5

Comparative13 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained15 labels6

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative57 labels in all, every segment counted; 13 of the 14 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Primalogik is highly recommended for small to mid-size teams needing structured competency frameworks and easy administration of multi-rater (360) cycles.” Mistral Small · 360 feedback · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“The best 360-degree feedback tool for a company with a limited budget is ThriveSparrow, Small Improvements, or Primalogik.” Llama 4 Maverick · 360 feedback · budget prompt · first choice

“Primalogik - Best balance of features and price ($3/user/month for dedicated 360 feedback)” MiniMax M2.5 · 360 feedback · budget prompt · first choice

“I'd recommend Primalogik as the top multi-rater (360-degree) feedback software” Grok 4.1 Fast · 360 feedback · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“many tools (Effy AI, Primalogik, PerformYard, 15Five, Lattice) charge for every employee” DeepSeek V4 Flash · 360 feedback · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Primalogik, over the 57 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Primalogik was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Small Improvements35 of 575Not in the top three

Spidergap32 of 578Not in the top three

Lattice30 of 573Compare →

Effy AI23 of 578Compare →

PerformYard23 of 571Not in the top three

ThriveSparrow22 of 571Not in the top three

SurveyMonkey21 of 571Not in the top three

15Five21 of 570Not in the top three

Culture Amp19 of 571Not in the top three

FeedbackPulse18 of 573Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Primalogik. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 52 of the 57 answers that named Primalogik and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

betterworks.com43

workhuman.com39

feedbackpulse.com36

peoplemanagingpeople.com36

nanoglobals.com35

teamflect.com24

business.com18

firsthr.app18

engagedly.com17

small-improvements.com16

282 of the 282 domain citations in answers naming Primalogik came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

betterworks.com/magazine/best-360-degree-feedback-tools42

workhuman.com/blog/best-360-degree-feedback-software-tools36

nanoglobals.com/recommended/360-degree-feedback-tools35

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-360-degree-feedback-software34

feedbackpulse.com/resources/best-360-review-software26

teamflect.com/blog/hr-tech/best-360-feedback-tools22

feedbackpulse.com/resources/360-feedback-tools19

business.com/articles/360-feedback-tools18

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Primalogik's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Primalogik, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at primalogik.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.