HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Findmyshift · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Findmyshift

10Judge labels

1First choices

1Negative labels

6 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

6 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Findmyshift was named 6 times in Workforce scheduling, where Deputy led with 26%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business46 of 85

under the label threshold

Mid-market11 of 94

under the label threshold

Enterprise104 of 117

under the label threshold

In workforce scheduling · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Findmyshift for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Workforce scheduling	Core HR and payroll	2%	11 of 94	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by Deputy at 26%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Findmyshift yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Findmyshift across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained4 labels1

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“includes Findmyshift, Homebase, Sling, 7shifts, and Connecteam, all of which have free plans” Llama 4 Maverick · Workforce scheduling · budget prompt · first choice

“Findmyshift if you want controlled publishing, recurring templates, and manager approvals” Perplexity Sonar · Workforce scheduling · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Other options to consider are Findmyshift and ZoomShift” Llama 4 Maverick · Workforce scheduling · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Findmyshift — Best for Simplicity” Kimi K2 · Workforce scheduling · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Findmyshift, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Findmyshift was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Homebase6 of 102Not in the top three

Sling6 of 101Not in the top three

When I Work5 of 101Not in the top three

Connecteam5 of 100Not in the top three

Deputy4 of 102Not in the top three

7shifts4 of 100Not in the top three

ZoomShift3 of 100Not in the top three

Shiftboard2 of 101Not in the top three

Float1 of 101Not in the top three

Rippling1 of 101Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Findmyshift. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 10 answers that named Findmyshift and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

zapier.com7

forbes.com6

peoplemanagingpeople.com6

joinhomebase.com5

worldmetrics.org4

business.com3

connecteam.com3

getapp.com3

gitnux.org3

guideflow.com3

Forty-three of the forty-three domain citations in answers naming Findmyshift came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

zapier.com/blog/best-employee-scheduling-software7

forbes.com/advisor/business/software/best-employee-scheduling-software6

business.com/categories/employee-scheduling-software3

guideflow.com/blog/shift-scheduling-software3

joinhomebase.com/blog/best-employee-scheduling-apps3

pcmag.com/picks/the-best-employee-scheduling-shift-planning-software3

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-employee-shift-scheduling-software3

worldmetrics.org/best/scheduling-and-shift-planning-software3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Findmyshift's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Findmyshift, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at findmyshift.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.