HR AI Index
Index Vendors › ZoomShift · September 2026 Edition
2 categories · Named, not ranked

ZoomShift

7Judge labels
0First choices
2Negative labels
3 of 12Models named it
2Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. ZoomShift was named 4 times in Workforce scheduling and 1 other category, where Deputy led with 26%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In workforce scheduling · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named ZoomShift for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Workforce schedulingCore HR and payroll0%28 of 940%3under 10 labels · led by Deputy at 26%
Employee onboardingOnboarding and employee experience0%98 of 104100%1under 10 labels · led by BambooHR at 29%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ZoomShift yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ZoomShift across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick01001
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00112
MiniMax M2.501001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Other options to consider are Findmyshift and ZoomShift” Llama 4 Maverick · Workforce scheduling · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“ZoomShift - Best for Simplicity” MiniMax M2.5 · Workforce scheduling · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Zoomshift – Exposed 865,000+ business accounts including employee invite data, GPS coordinates, and billing details” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Employee onboarding · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ZoomShift, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ZoomShift was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Homebase4 of 71Not in the top three
Deputy3 of 71Not in the top three
When I Work3 of 71Not in the top three
Findmyshift3 of 70Not in the top three
Sling2 of 72Not in the top three
Shiftboard2 of 71Not in the top three
TimeTrex2 of 70Not in the top three
Float1 of 71Not in the top three
7shifts1 of 70Not in the top three
Acuity Scheduling1 of 70Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ZoomShift. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 7 answers that named ZoomShift and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

peoplemanagingpeople.com6
zapier.com5
forbes.com4
joinhomebase.com4
pcmag.com4
business.com3
worldmetrics.org3
connecteam.com2
guideflow.com2
softwareadvice.com2

Thirty-five of the thirty-five domain citations in answers naming ZoomShift came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as ZoomShift

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as ZoomShift; a claim can dispute any of them.
Zoomshift 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ZoomShift's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ZoomShift, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at zoomshift.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack