HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Paychex Time & Attendance · September 2026 Edition

Paychex · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Paychex Time & Attendance

3Judge labels

0First choices

2Negative labels

3 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Paychex Time & Attendance was named 1 time in Time and attendance, where UKG Ready led with 15%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business56 of 73

under the label threshold

Mid-market74 of 90

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In time and attendance · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Paychex Time & Attendance for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Time and attendance	Core HR and payroll	0%	74 of 90	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by UKG Ready at 15%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Paychex Time & Attendance yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Paychex Time & Attendance across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid if you need flexible leave policies or expect prompt correction of errors without extra fees.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Time and attendance · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Paychex Time & Attendance, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Paychex Time & Attendance was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

QuickBooks Time3 of 32Not in the top three

UKG Pro2 of 30Not in the top three

Buddy Punch1 of 31Not in the top three

Deputy1 of 31Not in the top three

ADP RUN1 of 30Not in the top three

ADP Time & Attendance1 of 30Not in the top three

Clockify1 of 30Not in the top three

Gusto1 of 30Not in the top three

OnPay Time Tracking1 of 30Not in the top three

Qqest / iSolved TimeForce1 of 30Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Paychex Time & Attendance. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 3 answers that named Paychex Time & Attendance and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

apps.apple.com1

bigideasdb.com1

capterra.com1

clockify.me1

community.spiceworks.com1

forbes.com1

gartner.com1

gusto.com1

itqlick.com1

learn.g2.com1

Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming Paychex Time & Attendance came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

apps.apple.com/us/app/isolved-timeforce/id9524591241

bigideasdb.com/software/time-attendance1

capterra.com/p/172648/Advanced-Time-and-Attendance/reviews1

clockify.me/blog/apps-tools/best-time-attendance-apps1

community.spiceworks.com/t/time-attendance-tracking-who-is-your-vendor/8136831

forbes.com/advisor/business/software/best-time-attendance-software1

gartner.com/reviews/market/time-and-attendance-software1

gusto.com/product/pricing1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Paychex Time & Attendance's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Paychex Time & Attendance, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at paychex.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.