Every category where a model named Runn for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Workforce planning	Workforce planning and analytics	0%	32 of 89	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 31%
Workforce management suites	Core HR and payroll	0%	50 of 95	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by ADP Workforce Now at 19%
Workforce scheduling	Core HR and payroll	0%	49 of 94	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Deputy at 26%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Runn yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Runn across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	2	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labels1

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative7 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Runn is a highly visual resource scheduling platform tailored specifically for scaling B2B professional services.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Workforce scheduling · direct prompt · alternative

“Choose operational tools (AG5, Runn) if your primary need is ... managing day-to-day capacity.” Kimi K2 · Workforce planning · comparative prompt · alternative

“Both offer affordable plans focused on resource scheduling and forecasting” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Workforce planning · budget prompt · alternative

“these best-of-breed resource schedulers are incredibly fast to adopt” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Workforce management sui · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Runn, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Runn was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Rippling11 of 171Not in the top three

Float9 of 172Not in the top three

ChartHop9 of 170Not in the top three

Homebase7 of 175Not in the top three

BambooHR7 of 173Not in the top three

Anaplan5 of 171Not in the top three

Visier5 of 170Not in the top three

Workday5 of 170Not in the top three

Deel4 of 170Not in the top three

Planday4 of 170Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Runn. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 17 answers that named Runn and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

thrivea.com8

joinhomebase.com6

learn.g2.com6

peoplemanagingpeople.com6

cubesoftware.com5

eresourcescheduler.com5

guideflow.com5

rippling.com5

teamhood.com5

connecteam.com3

Fifty-four of the fifty-four domain citations in answers naming Runn came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

thrivea.com/blog/best-workforce-planning-tools-for-small-businesses8

joinhomebase.com/blog/workforce-planning-tools6

learn.g2.com/best-workforce-planning-software6

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-workforce-planning-software6

cubesoftware.com/blog/workforce-planning-software5

eresourcescheduler.com/blog/top-10-workforce-planning-tools5

rippling.com/blog/workforce-planning-tools5

teamhood.com/productivity/workforce-planning-tools5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Runn's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Runn, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at runn.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.