EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 24 of 72, unchanged
SAP People Intelligence
4Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
2 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. SAP People Intelligence was named 1 time in People analytics, where Crunchr led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market54 of 114
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise21 of 79
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
In people analytics · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named SAP People Intelligence for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| People analytics | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 54 of 114 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Crunchr at 22% |
Movement
Since September 2026, SAP People Intelligence held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.
Best category · People analytics · by segment
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| People analytics | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 54 of 114, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated SAP People Intelligence across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated SAP People Intelligence across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“SAP-centered organizations ... People Intelligence has its own licensing and setup requirements” GPT-6 Luna · People analytics · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SAP People Intelligence, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SAP People Intelligence was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SAP People Intelligence, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SAP People Intelligence was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SAP People Intelligence. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named SAP People Intelligence and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
visier.com4
oracle.com3
orgvue.com3
sap.comYour site3
workday.com3
help.sap.comYour site2
onemodel.co2
alight.com1
charthop.com1
crunchr.com1
Eighteen of the twenty-three domain citations in answers naming SAP People Intelligence came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Names read as SAP People Intelligence
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SAP People Intelligence; a claim can dispute any of them.
SAP People Intelligence / SuccessFactors analytics 1
Follow SAP People Intelligence
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
SAP is the company behind SAP People Intelligence.ShowHide
The company
SAP is the company behind SAP People Intelligence.
ShowHideOn record
Company records- Also from SAP
- SAP Analytics Cloud, SAP Ariba, SAP BPC / SAP Analytics Cloud, SAP ECC, SAP Engagement Cloud, SAP Fieldglass, SAP GRC, SAP Joule and 24 more
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- an AI-driven solution that brings together people, skills, and business data—from SAP SuccessFactors and beyond—into actionable insights that help leaders make more informed people and business decisions
- For
- HR teams
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What SAP People Intelligence's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: sap.com/blogs/people-intelligence, sap.com/research/artificial-intelligence-for-hr, sap.com/resources/people-intelligence-guiding-hr-in-age-of-ai, sap.com/resources/workforce-intelligence-turns-skills-into-action, sap.com/swiss/blogs/people-intelligence. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SAP People Intelligence's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SAP People Intelligence, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SAP People Intelligence by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where SAP People Intelligence is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name SAP People Intelligence, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.