Every category where a model named Microsoft Viva Glint for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Employee engagement surveys	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	20 of 77	25%	8	under 10 labels · led by Culture Amp at 40%
People analytics	Workforce planning and analytics	0%	70 of 99	33%	3	under 10 labels · led by HiBob at 15%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Microsoft Viva Glint yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Microsoft Viva Glint across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	0	2
Mistral Small	0	2	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	2	0	2	4
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	1	1
Kimi K2	2	0	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct9 labelsNone

Paraphrase7 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained6 labels2

Scale-constrained10 labelsNone

Negative6 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative40 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Built for Microsoft-centric organizations... Best for: Microsoft-heavy enterprises.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Employee engagement surv · comparative prompt · alternative

“Microsoft Viva Glint | If you're a Microsoft shop, tight integration” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Employee engagement surv · scale prompt · alternative

“Engagement surveys | Culture Amp, Glint (Microsoft), Peakon” Kimi K2 · People analytics · negative prompt · alternative

“Best if You're Microsoft-Heavy: Microsoft Viva Glint” Kimi K2 · Employee engagement surv · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid enterprise platforms like Culture Amp, Qualtrics, or Microsoft Viva Glint” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Employee engagement surv · budget prompt · hard negative

“Only if you're already deep in the Microsoft 365/LinkedIn ecosystem” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Employee engagement surv · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

“Avoid "Survey-Lite" Platforms if You Need Operational Data” Qwen 3.7 Flash · People analytics · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Microsoft Viva Glint, over the 39 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Microsoft Viva Glint was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Culture Amp35 of 3915Not in the top three

Workday Peakon Employee Voice25 of 392Not in the top three

Qualtrics EmployeeXM24 of 395Not in the top three

Lattice16 of 391Not in the top three

15Five12 of 393Not in the top three

CultureMonkey9 of 390Not in the top three

Workleap Officevibe8 of 390Not in the top three

Visier5 of 390Not in the top three

Workday People Analytics4 of 390Not in the top three

Qualtrics XM3 of 391Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Microsoft Viva Glint. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 30 of the 39 answers that named Microsoft Viva Glint and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

culturemonkey.io16

feedbackpulse.com15

selectsoftwarereviews.com14

eletive.com12

happily.ai11

thrivesparrow.com11

engagedly.com10

workhuman.com10

assessmentcloud.com9

capterra.com9

117 of the 117 domain citations in answers naming Microsoft Viva Glint came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

feedbackpulse.com/resources/best-employee-survey-software12

selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/best-employee-engagement-software11

engagedly.com/blog/best-employee-engagement-survey-softwares10

assessmentcloud.com/blog/best-employee-survey-software9

hrfuture.net/strategy-operations/top-employee-engagement-survey-software-in-20269

thrivesparrow.com/blog/best-employee-engagement-software8

workhuman.com/blog/employee-engagement-software8

capterra.com/resources/best-employee-engagement-software-reviews-analysis7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Microsoft Viva Glint

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Microsoft Viva Glint; a claim can dispute any of them.

Glint 2Glint (LinkedIn) 1Glint (Microsoft Viva) 1Glint (Microsoft) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Microsoft Viva Glint's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Microsoft Viva Glint, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at microsoft.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.