HR AI Index
Index Vendors › CultureMonkey · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

CultureMonkey

27Judge labels
3First choices
0Negative labels
11 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
7% in Employee engagement surv for enterprise buyers
Rank 15 of 77 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 5 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In employee engagement surv · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named CultureMonkey for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Employee engagement surveysOnboarding and employee experience0%15 of 770%5under 10 labels · led by Culture Amp at 40%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for CultureMonkey yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated CultureMonkey across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash01102
Llama 4 Maverick01001
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200101
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct6 labels1
Paraphrase11 labels2
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained8 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative27 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Excellent if you have a distributed/global team that needs multi-channel delivery” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Employee engagement surv · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“CultureMonkey is best for enterprises with global and distributed teams” Llama 4 Maverick · Employee engagement surv · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as CultureMonkey, over the 27 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CultureMonkey was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Culture Amp21 of 278Not in the top three
Workday Peakon Employee Voice19 of 274Not in the top three
Qualtrics EmployeeXM15 of 274Not in the top three
Microsoft Viva Glint9 of 270Not in the top three
Lattice7 of 270Not in the top three
Qualtrics XM6 of 272Not in the top three
15Five5 of 271Not in the top three
Perceptyx5 of 270Not in the top three
Workleap Officevibe3 of 270Not in the top three
Leapsome2 of 270Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CultureMonkey. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 26 of the 27 answers that named CultureMonkey and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

culturemonkey.ioYour site24
feedbackpulse.com17
happily.ai10
hrfuture.net9
peoplemanagingpeople.com8
questionpro.com8
vantagecircle.com8
capterra.com7
contactmonkey.com7
matterapp.com7

Eighty-one of the 105 domain citations in answers naming CultureMonkey came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CultureMonkey's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CultureMonkey, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at culturemonkey.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack